TokenTreasury_

vip
Age 0.6 Yıl
Peak Tier 0
No content yet
The evolution of AI is shifting its focus. Speed and cost advantages are leveling off—the real bottleneck now lies elsewhere. As models become cheaper and faster, the scarcity pivots to something more fundamental: data integrity and trust.
This pivot matters. When computational resources stop being the limiting factor, attention turns to source validation. Where does information originate? Who stands behind it? Why does it actually work in real-world conditions?
Verification becomes the new competitive edge. The platforms and systems that can reliably track data lineage, establish contributor
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
RatioHuntervip:
Data trust is the real key to making a difference; when computing power becomes cheap, it’s no longer as scarce... It seems that projects that control the data source are the true trump cards.
View More
While techniques like scaffolding are highly anticipated, honestly, they fundamentally cannot solve the core problem of AI hallucinations. Just look at what large models are still doing—generating false information, fabricating data, and making things up—these issues are endless. Are framework-based constraints useful? They have some effect, but far from enough. Unless the model's learning mechanisms and knowledge verification systems are fundamentally improved, these patchwork solutions can only alleviate superficial symptoms at best. The current development direction of AI technology still r
View Original
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
MissedAirdropAgainvip:
Fixing and patching will never develop real skills; scaffolding is just a placebo.
View More
Celestia's network engine keeps humming 💪 The modular blockchain layer continues to process significant data throughput, with 88 GiB of information successfully uploaded to the network. On-chain activity tells an impressive story: 186 million blocks have been added to the ledger, while validators have confirmed a cumulative 77.6 million transactions. These figures showcase the steady growth and operational efficiency of Celestia's infrastructure as the network scales its capacity to handle more complex data availability demands.
TIA-2,23%
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
HalfPositionRunnervip:
88GiB? Only uploaded this much? I thought Celestia was about to take off.
View More
Recently, I tinkered with an interesting technical solution. Automatically extract command records from the CC log's .jsonl file, then use AI-assisted custom skills to visualize the entire session execution process.
It sounds simple, but the actual implementation is a bit complex — first, you need to figure out the data structure of the logs, then use the Artifacts feature to build a visualization interface. The entire session runtime shows over 2 hours, but most of the time was idle.
Treating the development process itself as data is quite helpful for workflow optimization. Especially when de
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
AlwaysQuestioningvip:
Oh wow, this idea is brilliant. I've been wanting to try data-driven workflow optimization for a while.

Wait, most of the time is idle during 2 hours? Seems like there's still room for exploration—what steps are the most time-consuming?

Handling jsonl format is really troublesome; I've run into issues with it before.

Can this automated extraction logic be open-sourced? I want to modify it and use it in my own project.

Awesome, you've discovered a new optimization approach.

But how is the stability of building visualizations with Artifacts? I've had cases where it failed before.

Repetitive tasks yield the greatest benefits—how much time can it save?

It looks like a mature solution. How did you come up with the idea of using the skill concept?

Honestly, I didn't quite understand the jsonl extraction part—could you explain it in more detail?

Can the entire session time distribution data be exported? It seems worth a deep dive.
View More
Building the MegaETH cross-chain bridge with clear prompt ideas is nothing mysterious.
The key is to let AI understand what you really want:
Clear requirement definition, no ambiguity
Accurate contract logic description, no guessing
Complete interaction flow diagram, no fantasies
This is the core of "vibes coding"—translating clear thinking into clear instructions. It's not just throwing a few casual sentences to the model and calling it a day, but being as precise as writing technical documentation. Once the prompt is detailed enough, the code framework generated by the model can be used dire
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
GateUser-addcaaf7vip:
That's right, details determine success or failure.
View More
Bruner's concept of scaffolding wasn't merely instrumental—he envisioned them as dynamic containers for meaning-making. These supports facilitated symbolic emergence rather than functioning as rigid instructional sequences.
Consider how modern language models approach similar problems. When generating contextual responses, they're essentially reconstructing meaning frameworks. The approach mirrors scaffolding philosophy: creating temporary structures that enable deeper cognitive engagement.
This isn't data extraction in the traditional sense. It's meaning synthesis—building relational contexts
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
MEVHunterBearishvip:
This scaffolding theory truly provides great inspiration for AI training... It feels like current LLMs are doing exactly that.

---

Wait, are we saying that GPT is also a kind of "scaffolding" in a sense? That's pretty amazing.

---

Bruner's theory directly comes to life in AI, no wonder current models are becoming smarter.

---

Meaning is integrated rather than just data extraction... Ah, this is the key.

---

So our AI is actually also "building scaffolds"? That's an interesting comparison.

---

The key is that phrase "temporary structure." Is that how current AI systems operate?

---

Finally, someone connected these two concepts. I've always wondered how they relate.
View More
Ever wonder where QR codes came from? Back in 1994, Japanese engineer Masahiro Hara working at Denso Wave developed them with a straightforward goal—tracking auto parts in car factories more efficiently.
But here's the thing: what started as a factory solution exploded into something way bigger. Today, QR codes are everywhere. They're embedded in payment systems making transactions frictionless, plastered across advertising campaigns to bridge physical and digital, managing ticket verification at events, even helping with pandemic safety tracking. The tech that once seemed niche now powers a s
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
down_only_larryvip:
I didn't expect that QR codes are actually made for tracking car parts... Now you can just scan a QR code to pay, it's really amazing.
View More
Why slower blockchains often outperform in the long run:
Full on-chain history creates genuine verifiability—you can't fake it, and that builds real reputation. Networks that maintain complete transaction records become trustworthy by design.
Higher transaction fees naturally filter for meaningful activity. Spam gets priced out, leaving room for serious value transfers. This isn't a bug; it's a feature that keeps networks lean.
Constraint forces specialization. When you accept that a chain has limitations, you design better bridges and cleaner interactions between different systems. Trying to
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
HashBanditvip:
ngl this hits different after watching my GPU mining setup become an antique lol. the whole "speed is vanity" thing... back in my mining days we thought hashrate was everything and look where that got us. fees filtering out spam actually makes sense tho, institutional money following security over tps is just... predictable? been saying this for years tbh. anyway l2s still the move imo
View More
Here's the core issue nobody talks about:
Race for speed comes with a brutal cost.
When chains prioritize throughput—churning out blocks faster and faster—they're essentially drowning in data they can't possibly maintain. The math doesn't work.
So what do they do? Aggressive pruning. Strip the historical records.
And with that goes years of verifiable transaction history—the kind of on-chain reputation and financial records that should be permanent.
Ten, fifteen, twenty years of data? Gone.
You're left with a chain that's fast on paper but functionally amnesic. No depth. No accountability trai
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
PerpetualLongervip:
Bro, isn't this just talking about the false prosperity of some L1s... How fast is it? All the data has been deleted, how can I check on-chain history? I almost got caught because of this before. Luckily, I added to my Ethereum position in time and held firm. I believe one day it will break through and recover.
View More
Settlement-focused unlocks are picking up steam. Direct BTC finality without CEX intermediaries or token wrappers hits different—it's native in the truest sense. One network, multiple communication layers. Beyond looks like they're pushing something real here. The idea of bridging directly to Bitcoin without sacrificing decentralization actually matters. Planning to spin up a cross-chain connection to Bitcoin this week to test how this plays out.
BTC-0,19%
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
ZeroRushCaptainvip:
Another story of "directly connecting to Bitcoin with lossless cross-chain." After all these years, I have only learned reverse operations.
View More
Protect yourself from malicious smart contracts with an early warning system. The platform lets you browse a comprehensive blacklist of flagged addresses or run a quick scan on any contract to assess its risk level. It's a straightforward way to do due diligence before interacting with on-chain protocols—catching potential threats before they drain your wallet.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
LayerZeroJunkievip:
Oh man, this thing really should have been available earlier, or else I keep getting scammed.
View More
What are the common challenges in implementing verification proofs at the Bitcoin layer? On-chain costs are not significantly high, but off-chain expenses have become a major obstacle.
Many designs similar to BitVM are stuck here. The cost structure is unbalanced—on-chain costs are not noticeably cheap, while off-chain costs are prohibitively expensive.
A breakthrough has emerged. The BABE scheme has broken through this dilemma.
What has it achieved? It has managed to keep the on-chain dispute verification costs within a reasonable range of BitVM3 while drastically reducing the off-chain stora
BTC-0,19%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
FromMinerToFarmervip:
1000x? How much would that be... Finally, someone has figured this out.
View More
AI Video Generation Tools Receive Major Upgrade with Significant Performance Improvements
The latest version of video generation capabilities has achieved a qualitative leap. Image clarity has been greatly improved, animation movements are smoother, and audio synchronization has completely resolved previous issues.
User experience has been noticeably enhanced. Simply input a text description, and the system can generate a complete video project. In addition to video generation, image editing features have also been strengthened, and overall processing speed has increased significantly.
Based o
View Original
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
SignatureVerifiervip:
ngl, "thoroughly resolved" audio sync is doing heavy lifting here... what exactly got fixed? third time asking for the actual technical breakdown before i trust the validation metrics
View More
Recently, I've seen people say that Ethereum is the next Solana, but most of them either don't understand the current situation or are deliberately stirring the pot.
Yes, after the Fusaka upgrade and the BPO1/2 hard fork, the block capacity of Ethereum L1 has indeed increased quite a bit. But the key issue is— the theoretical TPS still far from satisfying the appetite of high-frequency trading. This is a ceiling that's hard to bypass.
Once on-chain activity continues to accumulate and block utilization approaches or even reaches 100%, congestion will occur. At that point, users will have no ch
ETH0,48%
SOL-1,26%
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
MerkleDreamervip:
Basically, it's short-term speculation; the real bottleneck is still that old problem.
View More
Anyone who manages to develop an AI agent capable of filtering the entire web and feeding you personalized content optimized to genuinely improve your life? That person's gonna be filthy rich.
Think about it—current algorithms are insanely powerful, almost relentlessly effective. To actually counter that level of manipulation, you'd need an AI working against it. The arms race is real. One system pushes content designed to addict and monetize you, another pushes back with actual utility in mind. Winner takes all in that game.
The future isn't about the algorithm itself anymore. It's about the
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
ChainSauceMastervip:
Honestly, this set of theories sounds quite romantic, but there are probably only a few who can actually achieve it.

Right now, it's an arms race. Platforms want to squeeze you, and countering AI requires counter-squeezing. Is it reliable?

I'm a bit convinced by the meta-layer protection theory, but I just don't know who will be the first to come out ahead.
View More
The implementation looks solid overall. One thing though—IPFS hasn't been smooth sailing for us. We ran into real pain points with our dapps, so we switched everything over to Cloudflare R2. The performance is noticeably better, the pricing model works, and security isn't a concern. That said, IPFS still has its place, but the ecosystem could really use some major improvements or fresh alternatives to address these gaps.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
ser_aped.ethvip:
IPFS has indeed been overhyped. R2 is great, but it's centralized.
View More
The technical issues of large financial institutions often stem from disorderly expansion. Rapidly scaling through mergers and acquisitions without truly unifying the underlying system architecture has resulted in a reliance on third-party IT outsourcing to maintain operations. These legacy problems have hindered efficiency and innovation speed. However, the emergence of AI has changed this situation—companies now have the motivation and tools to completely resolve these technical debts instead of continuing to outsource to contractors. This wave of AI may be precisely what drives traditional
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
DAOTruantvip:
To be honest, the operations by traditional financial institutions now are a bit like closing the stable door after the horse has bolted, but at least they have finally patched it.

Can AI really save their mess? I'm a bit skeptical.

The debt history is too deep; it's not something that can be shaken off just by the appearance of AI.

The outsourcing approach is ingrained in their bones, and changing it is difficult.

But on the other hand, this time is indeed a bit different, and there is a real chance to start over.

They might even be overtaken by startups in a bend.

In the fintech sector, I still favor native solutions, not those that are just re-engineered.
View More
Is it technically possible for XCU developers to configure the protocol's fee distribution mechanism to redirect collected fees toward external addresses or historical figures as a governance experiment? What are the smart contract constraints here?
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
ConsensusDissentervip:
Haha, the issue of XCU's fee reallocation... To be honest, I think there's nothing technically impossible about it, but the real question is, why do it? Isn't this just digging your own grave?
View More
A common overlooked issue: when we are immersed in financial data and market expectations, we often ignore the fundamental laws of the physical world. The chip industry is entering a critical turning point—the end of Moore's Law planar scaling.
The reality is harsh. The era of simply shrinking transistor sizes to improve performance and density has essentially ended. Capacity expansion has hit physical limits. This is not a problem that capital can solve, but a constraint of physics.
So where is the breakthrough? Vertical stacking. This is now the industry’s widely recognized only solution. Th
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
GweiWatchervip:
摩尔定律撞墙了啊,说白了就是得往上堆了,这才是真正的技术突破吧
View More
Operating a tokenized economy at scale demands serious computational firepower. Validators keeping these networks alive—ensuring fast settlement and minimal latency—can't skimp on hardware. You're looking at enterprise-grade servers, professional data center infrastructure, and rock-solid network connectivity. That's the baseline. The infrastructure game is evolving fast. As transaction volumes spike and networks compete on throughput, validator requirements keep climbing. It's not just about spinning up a node anymore—it's about having the right physical setup backing it.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
GateUser-5854de8bvip:
That's right, the hardware requirements for validators are indeed getting higher and higher. Small retail investors really can't afford to play.
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)