It's becoming clearer now—many development teams shipped way too early. Waiting for agentic coding assistants to mature would've saved serious time and resources.
Look at the trajectory: coding agents are getting smarter, video generation tools are leveling up, multimodal AI keeps improving. The pattern is obvious. If you're building something now, ask yourself honestly—will this be faster to develop manually, or should you sit tight and let AI catch up first?
The math changes when you factor in six-month or one-year development cycles. Sometimes lazy beats rushing. Your backlog can probably wait while the tooling catches up. Better infrastructure beats early-mover disadvantage in plenty of cases.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
liquidation_watcher
· 3h ago
ngl, this logic sounds good, but in practice, it's a whole different story... Who the hell can wait?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 3h ago
That's really well said. I'm currently facing this pain point. The project rushed to launch two years ago now feels somewhat redundant, as the maturity of AI tools has completely changed.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPhoenix
· 3h ago
To be honest, many teams are just short-sighted and profit-driven. The AI tools are experiencing a rebirth, and entering the market now might really be much better than rushing in last year [Laughing].
This time, what are we waiting for to buy the dip? Giving tools time to build momentum is worth more than rushing to work tirelessly. Rebuilding the mindset, brothers.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 4h ago
This guy's point is spot on. Those still coding manually should really reflect.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 4h ago
Stop talking nonsense. Back then, we had no choice but to start early; there was no option. Now saying to wait until AI matures is indeed heartbreaking, but who knew it would develop like this back then? Truly.
It's becoming clearer now—many development teams shipped way too early. Waiting for agentic coding assistants to mature would've saved serious time and resources.
Look at the trajectory: coding agents are getting smarter, video generation tools are leveling up, multimodal AI keeps improving. The pattern is obvious. If you're building something now, ask yourself honestly—will this be faster to develop manually, or should you sit tight and let AI catch up first?
The math changes when you factor in six-month or one-year development cycles. Sometimes lazy beats rushing. Your backlog can probably wait while the tooling catches up. Better infrastructure beats early-mover disadvantage in plenty of cases.