BlockchainArch

A major US exchange quietly changed its stance and withdrew support for the Clarity Act. This move instantly ignited discussions in Washington.
What’s behind this? The issue of stablecoin yields has become the focal point. The exchange’s shift in attitude not only reflects the current market situation but also exposes the disagreements between regulators and the industry regarding the distribution of stablecoin rights.
This move has intensified the conflict. Supporters believe it will hinder the legislative process for the industry, while opponents see the potential value in stablecoin yields.

Would you be willing to use stablecoins if they lack yield mechanisms and DeFi attributes?
Behind this question, there is actually a real clash between the US policy circle and a leading compliant platform. Many people have not yet truly understood the core interests behind this friction.
To clarify, we need to start with the regulatory bill that the market has been expecting for over a year. The CLARITY Act was originally hoped for by the industry and was almost regarded as the most critical legislative window for the US crypto industry in 2025 to 2026. The White House has also been promoting

The Central Bank of Russia tightens regulation before the legalization of cryptocurrencies in 2026.
To prepare for legalization, the Central Bank of Russia recently introduced a new banking reporting mechanism. All financial institutions are now required to provide the regulatory authorities with complete information on crypto-related transactions. This move marks a significant step for Russia in establishing a regulated crypto ecosystem.
The transparency requirements are extremely strict. Banks need to report details of clients' crypto transactions, fund flows, and counterparty information. T

It may seem like bad news, but it actually hides opportunities. When the leader of a major compliant platform revealed the White House's latest attitude shift, it stood in stark contrast to previous negative public opinion.
Specifically: the head of a leading compliant platform recently gave an interview, elaborating on the latest developments in US cryptocurrency regulation and the legal framework construction. He mentioned that although the market was previously filled with bearish voices, the official policy orientation towards the digital asset industry is quietly improving. This change in

Crypto regulation doesn't have to be the enemy. The real move is working alongside regulators rather than against them. When you get regulatory clarity in place, companies actually get breathing room to scale and innovate properly. It's not about fighting the rules—it's about building the right framework so the whole industry can grow sustainably.

The U.S. White House has reaffirmed that establishing a national Bitcoin reserve remains a strategic priority for the country. However, progress on this initiative is being constrained by interagency coordination challenges and existing regulatory frameworks that require alignment across multiple government departments.
This acknowledgment highlights the complexity of implementing large-scale cryptocurrency policy at the federal level. While the administration's commitment to Bitcoin reserves signals growing institutional recognition of digital assets, the bureaucratic hurdles—ranging from leg

Major Banks Face Accountability Over Account Closures
A high-profile legal challenge is brewing. Former U.S. President Donald Trump is preparing legal action against JPMorgan Chase, alleging wrongful account termination stemming from post-January 6th events. Trump contends the bank's decision was politically driven rather than based on legitimate business reasons.
JPMorgan maintains its account closure decisions are made on compliance grounds, not political considerations. However, this case could set significant precedent for how financial institutions handle sensitive account management deci

Recently, I have received quite a few inquiries about taxes. To be honest, this topic has been emphasized repeatedly a few years ago. But what is the reality? So far, I haven't heard of anyone being pursued by exchanges or relevant authorities for tax payments when withdrawing funds. It seems to have become an unresolved issue — the discussion remains heated, but there are very few actual cases.

The crypto market is at a critical juncture. The advancement of the Clarity Act regulatory framework is exerting increasing pressure on the entire industry, with major institutions becoming more transparent in their actions. Market participants have already begun to position themselves for the cycle adjustment in 2026.
From recent market performance, institutional-level holding strategies are gradually emerging. Although regulatory pressure is intensifying, it is also shaping a new market landscape—projects and platforms that can adapt to the new environment will attract more institutional cap

The President of Brazil's Superior Court of Justice recently made an important ruling, refusing to open relevant files to the defense in a money laundering case. The suspect has fled to Oman and is identified as a key figure in the "Alkassariya Operation" case. The case spans from 2021 to 2024 and involves an organization engaging in money laundering through shell companies, large cash deposits, and complex multi-layered account structures, with the involved amount reaching approximately 1.2 billion reais. This case reflects the evolution of traditional money laundering methods in the digital

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong pushes back on recent speculation, clarifying that the current administration remains strongly supportive of crypto market development. "The White House has been incredibly collaborative throughout this process," Armstrong stated, reaffirming that government backing for comprehensive market structure legislation hasn't wavered. The exchange leader's comments come amid ongoing discussions around regulatory frameworks for digital assets, with industry players closely monitoring legislative progress. Armstrong's remarks suggest optimism regarding the path forward for

EU LAWMAKERS BLOCK TRADE AGREEMENT OVER TARIFF DISPUTE
European Union lawmakers are putting the brakes on a key trade agreement with the United States following recent tariff threats from the US administration over Greenland-related geopolitical tensions.
The trade deal, which is partially operational but lacks full ratification, is now expected to face significant delays or potential collapse. This move signals rising protectionist sentiment in transatlantic negotiations and could reshape trade dynamics affecting global markets—including cryptocurrency exchanges and cross-border financial ser

The wave of cryptocurrency regulation controversy reignites and sparks heated discussion. Recently, a leading trading platform and U.S. government agencies have fallen into a major dispute over Stablecoin revenue issues. This conflict is impacting the long-anticipated progress of key legislation such as the CLARITY Act. As an essential infrastructure in the crypto ecosystem, the policy positioning of Stablecoin revenue mechanisms has become a focal point. This dispute involves the compliant operational space of stablecoins and directly influences the direction of subsequent regulatory framewor

A senior executive from a leading exchange recently clarified some rumors regarding the White House's policy stance. He insisted that the White House has been proactive in promoting cryptocurrency-related legislation and is not as unpredictable as the outside world has rumored.
It is reported that the White House had proactively communicated with the exchange, hoping to facilitate a cooperative dialogue with the banking industry. The starting point of this cooperation is quite interesting — the focus is not on special treatment for big banks, but on enabling community banks and small to medium

The White House has extended an invitation to players across the crypto sector to rejoin discussions around the Clarity Act. This move signals renewed momentum in the conversation between federal authorities and the digital asset community regarding legislative frameworks. The industry's participation in these negotiations could prove pivotal in shaping how digital assets are regulated moving forward. With stakeholders from various segments of crypto returning to the table, there's potential to bridge perspectives and work toward clearer regulatory standards that both protect consumers and all

Reports indicate that a major government is moving toward permanent internet compartmentalization, with access restricted to state-vetted individuals only. This marks an escalation in digital sovereignty strategies that's been brewing for years. The move highlights exactly why decentralized networks and blockchain infrastructure matter—when traditional internet access becomes politically gated, permissionless systems become the backup plan. For crypto communities, this is a stark reminder that trustless networks aren't just nice-to-have tech; they're essential infrastructure in a world where g

MEXC Exchange has announced a service adjustment, temporarily halting operations for users based in India. This move reflects the ongoing regulatory landscape shifts across different markets as major exchanges continue to navigate compliance requirements in key regions. The pause affects new registrations and account services in that territory, marking another instance of platforms adapting their geographic service models in response to local regulatory frameworks.

European policymakers are increasingly vocal about pushing back on U.S. trade practices through reciprocal tariffs. Some are even exploring the possibility of restricting American firms from operating within the EU market. This shift in stance could reshape how tech and financial platforms—including crypto exchanges and blockchain companies—navigate European operations and regulatory compliance.

A significant step forward for blockchain development: Senators Lummis and Wyden have introduced the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act of 2026, targeting a critical gap in current crypto regulation. The legislation specifically shields open-source blockchain developers and infrastructure operators from being classified as money transmitters—a designation that has created legal ambiguity for contributors who have no control over user funds. This distinction is crucial for the decentralized ecosystem, as it acknowledges the difference between builders and custodians. The bill aims to clarify r

Contrary to some skepticism, government officials have actually shown a constructive approach to crypto integration. Recent discussions indicate they're actively engaging with stakeholders to explore feasible solutions. One key area involves ongoing negotiations with banking institutions to facilitate better cooperation. The dialogue has generated several promising initiatives aimed at bridging the gap between traditional finance and blockchain ecosystems. This collaborative stance marks a shift from purely regulatory scrutiny toward problem-solving partnership.