BlockchainArch

vip
Age 0.6 Yıl
Peak Tier 0
No content yet
A major shift is happening in traditional finance. Newrez, a prominent US mortgage lender, is set to accept cryptocurrency holdings as qualifying assets for non-agency mortgages beginning in February. The approved digital assets include Bitcoin, Ethereum, spot ETFs, and USD stablecoins—but with a key requirement: they must be held on US-regulated platforms. The move reflects growing institutional recognition of crypto's role in financial portfolios. However, there's a catch. To account for market volatility, these crypto assets will be subject to discounts when calculating their value for mort
BTC-0,21%
ETH-0,4%
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
ProveMyZKvip:
Hmm... a discount? What's the point then? It's still better to hold fiat currency for stability.
View More
Watch out for presale scams targeting SOL holders. If you're sending SOL or any tokens to a presale address without proper verification, you're essentially making a donation—and likely losing your funds. These schemes are designed to look legitimate, but they prey on FOMO and lack of due diligence. Before participating in any presale, verify the official channels, check the project's documentation, and cross-reference claims across multiple sources. Don't rush. The crypto space moves fast, but taking time to research isn't paranoia—it's survival. Protect your wallet, do your homework, and stay
SOL1,71%
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
AmateurDAOWatchervip:
Ha, it's the same old story, someone always falls for it...
View More
Recent statements from U.S. government officials clarify that the 6.4 million dollars' worth of Bitcoin seized from imprisoned Samourai Wallet developers remains in government custody rather than having been liquidated. This announcement addresses previous speculation about whether authorities had already disposed of the confiscated assets on the open market. The clarification marks an important detail for those tracking how law enforcement handles digital asset seizures and the broader implications for the cryptocurrency community.
BTC-0,21%
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
TradingNightmarevip:
Well, the $64 million worth of BTC is still sitting in the US government's hands. This move is quite interesting.
View More
Cascading commission scheme: you receive 20% on the first level, 6% on the second, and 3% on the third. Does it seem attractive? Be careful. When the earning structure is mainly based on recruiting new members rather than actual product sales, we are dealing with a typical pyramid scheme. This is not legitimate cryptocurrency activity. It is important to recognize warning signs: promises of passive income through referrals, emphasis on recruiting more than on actual products, lack of clear revenue. Protect your wallet and those around you.
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
RamenDeFiSurvivorvip:
20% first layer? Too easy, this smells like smoke from afar
View More
Government officials from the current administration have indicated that Bitcoin acquisition remains a strategic priority. Recent policy signals suggest major announcements regarding a national Bitcoin strategic reserve could be unveiled soon. This move reflects growing institutional acceptance of cryptocurrency at the federal level and could significantly impact market dynamics. 🚀
BTC-0,21%
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
LiquidationAlertvip:
Hmm... Is the official going to accumulate Bitcoin? It’s really happening now.
View More
In a recent statement, a prominent crypto advocate revealed his willingness to prioritize institutional backing over short-term price momentum. "I'd trade away the next 90 days of gains if it means securing support from the trillion-dollar banking sector or working with the world's most influential regulators," he explained. The sentiment reflects a strategic shift in how major industry figures view BTC adoption—moving beyond pure price appreciation toward building the infrastructure and regulatory framework needed for mainstream acceptance. This perspective underscores the broader debate with
BTC-0,21%
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
MidnightMEVeatervip:
Good morning everyone, it's 3 a.m. and you're still talking about this. Giving up a 90-day increase just to gain institutional approval? Nice words, but it's nothing more than finding an excuse for a market dump.
View More
Amarin's Patent Battle Heads to Top Court: What the 'Skinny Label' Case Means
Amarin Corporation is facing a critical juncture as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in a major patent dispute centered on 'skinny labeling' practices. This case could reshape how pharmaceutical companies navigate intellectual property protection and market exclusivity.
The core issue revolves around whether Amarin can maintain patent protection while using narrower product labeling—a strategy known in the industry as 'skinny labeling.' The outcome could have significant ripple effects across the pha
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
MetaMiseryvip:
The skinny label tactic has long been overdue for investigation. These pharma folks are masters at exploiting loopholes... If the Supreme Court overturns AMRN, they'll be in for a setback.
View More
Government seizure of cryptocurrency assets from developers without restitution raises serious concerns. When authorities confiscate digital assets, questions emerge about property rights, due process, and the fairness of asset handling. Developers deserve clarity on whether their holdings will be returned or permanently retained by the state. Some regulators appear more focused on promoting favorable policy narratives than ensuring equitable treatment of affected parties. The crypto community watches closely as these precedents shape future government interactions with digital asset holders a
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
SignatureVerifiervip:
ngl, the "due process" framing here is technically speaking kind of... insufficient? like, where's the actual validation of what these seizures were supposedly justified under? requires further auditing before we even get to the restitution debate tbh
View More
There's growing interest in mapping the intersection of crypto regulation, political funding, and industry lobbying efforts. Compiling crypto legislation, lawmakers, their financial backers, and registered lobbyists into a comprehensive database could enhance transparency in how policy decisions get shaped. Worth exploring for better industry visibility.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
CryptoMotivatorvip:
Oh, so you want to play that transparency game again? Honestly, the relationship between regulators and lobbyists is already obvious, and building a database won't change anything, right?
View More
Industry perspective on token regulation: The Clarity Act has become bloated with too many provisions. Various lobbying groups keep pushing their own agendas into the bill, turning a focused piece of legislation into something overly complex. The core purpose should remain straightforward—establishing a clear classification framework for blockchain tokens. That's what matters most to the ecosystem. However, what's gotten lost is that the industry consensus centers on token classification standards, not tangential issues like Treasury yields. Adding unrelated provisions dilutes the bill's effec
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
New_Ser_Ngmivip:
It's the same old trick again, lobbying groups get involved and the bill gets scrapped.
View More
The US government has officially clarified its Bitcoin stance: it has not sold any of its holdings and has no plans to do so going forward. This statement comes as a significant signal regarding the government's long-term position on cryptocurrency assets.
BTC-0,21%
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
WalletDoomsDayvip:
Hold on and don't sell? Is the government playing psychological warfare or do they really have such great confidence...
View More
Do you know what a succession is? It is the legal mechanism through which a person's assets are transferred when they pass away. It is mandatory whenever the deceased has assets or even outstanding debts. However, there is an important exception: if they have already transferred their assets during their lifetime, then succession will not be necessary. In summary, it is the process established by law to ensure that the estate is properly distributed among the heirs.
View Original
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
LayerZeroJunkievip:
Transferring funds during life is really the best, directly bypassing a bunch of hassle.
View More
Washington signals major shift on bitcoin holdings. According to statements from the current administration, confiscated bitcoin from the Samourai Wallet case will remain in government custody—zero sale plans. The seized assets are earmarked for inclusion in the nation's strategic bitcoin reserve. This marks a significant policy direction: rather than liquidating recovered digital assets, the government is treating bitcoin as a core strategic holding. The move reflects growing institutional acceptance of cryptocurrency within state reserves, alongside the broader narrative of nations building
BTC-0,21%
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
AirdropFreedomvip:
Finally, the moment has arrived. The U.S. government is no longer selling and is directly accumulating coins. This is the correct stance.
View More
Regulatory tensions are heating up on multiple fronts. Fed Chair Powell just got hit with DOJ grand-jury subpoenas connected to his testimony—a move that's raising alarm bells about threats to Federal Reserve independence. Meanwhile, the Senate is still grinding through the crypto market-structure bill, now dealing with a hefty 137 amendments before the final text drops on January 21st. On top of that, Galaxy highlighted some serious concerns: Treasury's pushing for surveillance powers that look suspiciously like Patriot Act provisions, giving authorities expansive reach into financial flows.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
LiquidityNinjavip:
NGL, the news that the Fed was summoned sounds ridiculous. Do they really want to take action against the crypto world? Truly absurd.
View More
A major US banking executive has raised an important regulatory question: if stablecoins are engineered to generate yield for holders, shouldn't they be classified and regulated like money market funds?
The comparison makes practical sense. Both offer users returns above zero while maintaining principal stability. Both are designed as accessible financial vehicles for the broader public. Yet stablecoins operating in the crypto space currently exist in a different regulatory framework.
This observation cuts to the heart of an ongoing debate in crypto policy: how should we categorize digital ass
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
TradFiRefugeevip:
Haha, those traditional finance folks are trying to control crypto again. This cracks me up.

---

Wait, are they trying to block yield stablecoins or do they really want to protect retail investors?

---

Applying the rules of money market funds to stablecoins, and their advantages are gone. This is a deliberate scheme.

---

Whether regulated or not, it's all centralized stuff. I'll stick to my own plan.

---

Basically, they're afraid crypto will take away their jobs. Now they're getting serious.
View More
Major trading platform executives are calling out traditional banking sector resistance to the current administration's crypto-friendly direction. The criticism highlights an emerging divide: financial institutions working to block regulatory progress that favors digital asset adoption and innovation. This friction between legacy finance and the crypto industry continues to shape policy outcomes.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
ForeverBuyingDipsvip:
Old banks are stubborn like dead ducks, just unwilling to relinquish power... Forget it, let's keep buying the dip and watch the show.
View More
The current US administration has been pushing forward an aggressive crypto agenda with three main pillars. First, the GENIUS Act—critics argue it's essentially a backdoor approach to CBDC implementation. Second, the CLARITY Act combined with market structure reforms that would tokenize virtually all non-monetary assets while simultaneously introducing CBDC-level surveillance mechanisms. Third, a crackdown on crypto activists and figures: enforcement actions against Ian Freeman, Roger Ver, Roman Storm, and Keonne have signaled an intensified regulatory posture. Whether these policies aim at co
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
GhostAddressHuntervip:
Hmm... GENIUS Act, CLARITY Act... sound very high-level, but in reality, they're just different disguises to pave the way for CBDC.

Going after Ian Freeman and those people? They're really treating regulation as a political tool.

Consumer protection? Laughable, it's just fear of DeFi dispersing power.

With this combination of measures, centralization will only increase.

CBDC + tokenized assets + comprehensive surveillance—this future sounds suffocating.
View More
Major crypto investor Mike Novogratz is bullish on the near-term passage of cryptocurrency market structure legislation. The billionaire believes that regulatory framework improvements for digital assets are increasingly likely to be finalized soon. Bitcoin and the broader crypto market could see significant impacts once these regulatory measures move forward, shaping how the sector operates going forward.
BTC-0,21%
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
DevChivevip:
Novogratz is bragging again. When will it actually come to fruition...
View More
A major compliant platform CEO recently spoke out, accusing traditional banking systems of obstructing the advancement of cryptocurrency policies. He stated that the true motive of these financial institutions is to protect their profit margins, and ultimately, the costs will be borne by ordinary people—they are effectively hollowing out the pockets of the common folk. These remarks hit a nerve within the crypto community: the long-standing conflict between traditional finance and the blockchain ecosystem, with the vested interests of the banking industry naturally conflicting with the develop
View Original
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
LadderToolGuyvip:
Those bank folks are stubbornly sticking to the old routines, really incredible... Someone should have exposed this long ago.
View More
Breaking: The Central Bank of Belarus has signaled that banks operating in the country could begin offering Bitcoin services within the next six months. This marks a significant shift toward mainstream adoption at the institutional level.
With 2026 shaping up as a pivotal year for banking sector integration of cryptocurrency, the development underscores growing momentum around Bitcoin legitimacy in traditional finance. Once regulatory frameworks solidify, we could see a wave of bank-backed digital asset services rolling out across Eastern European markets.
The timing aligns with broader global
BTC-0,21%
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
CountdownToBrokevip:
Wow, is the Belarusian Central Bank really about to embrace Bitcoin? They could start providing services within six months, this pace is quite aggressive... Is a storm really brewing in Eastern Europe?
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)