GateUser-8ca669fd

It seems to be about enabling funds to flow more freely and reducing friction costs; if implemented properly, River will be more user-friendly.

Last night at the station waiting for the bus, I casually did a token swap on the blockchain, and ended up getting educated by myself: watching the price jump happily, I just went all in, didn’t adjust the slippage, didn’t check the pool depth, and the moment I executed the trade, I was directly "eaten" for a chunk. To put it simply, it’s not the market trapping me, it’s that I placed the order too hastily, when I could have split it into two, waited a few seconds for the depth to come back a bit, but I insisted on chasing the price… Anyway, I lost quite cleanly this time.
What I fear most isn

Recently, I've seen everyone talking about AI Agents going directly on-chain to do work, which sounds convenient and imaginative, but I think the most critical parts that need human oversight are "authorization" and "revoking authorization": robots can run according to strategies, but once they are given the wrong permissions or sign the wrong contracts, no matter how smart they are later, they can't be saved. Also, when encountering on-chain congestion, slippage, or wild price jumps, the Agent will execute stubbornly, and humans need to hit the pause button to prevent it from turning emotions