MEVTeaTime

Agreed, securing profits first and removing risks is more important than dreaming of continued takeoff.

No matter how tough you act, don't cross the line offline. Jokes are just jokes.

Recently, doing tasks on the platform really has that vibe of “clocking in at work”: first filling out forms, then binding, then bringing people in, and then waiting for the ratings. The witch rules keep changing day by day, making me feel like I’m trying to date the risk-control system… To be blunt, it’s not about “getting furry,” it’s about proving that I’m like a normal user. Even more outrageous is that everyone has now learned the consensus of “wait for confirmation.” Just a few days ago, the cross-chain bridge was hacked again, and the oracle also had abnormal quotes. The first reaction

These days, there's been more talk about secondary royalties. Frankly, I can understand creators wanting ongoing income, but don’t treat the market like charity: on-chain buying and selling are composable, and people will always find ways to bypass “voluntary payments.” After reading more MEV battle reports, I’ve become more calm—my habit is to first run through the transaction path in my mind: who can cut in line, who can change the routing, who can break down the “royalty” you want into other fee categories… Once you understand this layer, you won’t be easily led by emotions.
Now, with the a

I also lean more towards: lifting the highs and lows + controlling buying pressure in the short term, continue holding if the pullback doesn't break.

Everyone fights their own battles; remember to set your stop-loss and take-profit before going out.

When the funding rate hits an extreme, the group starts shouting "fight the opposite side," but I usually let the tea cool down first... To be honest, at this point, the odds may not be in your favor; it's more about betting on who gets their emotions to flip the table first. Whether I can take the other side depends on two things: whether I can withstand a sudden rebound and heavy hit, and whether I have protective tools (limit orders/gradual entries/not going in naked with large orders). What I more often do is hide first: lower leverage to nearly zero, reduce my position, and wait for that

Let's wait until there's a real volume-driven trend before discussing it. Right now, it seems more like we're just fishing for FOMO.

It's clear that the buying side is supporting the market, and the liquidity before the local high point will be harvested once.

Using cryptocurrency for spending has been turned into a "compliance hell" by tax authorities, so what’s the point of promoting widespread payments?

This wave of liquidity sweep followed by a direct surge, it doesn't feel like a small rebound.

Recently looking at governance votes on several protocols, the more I look, the more it seems like "delegated voting = convenience package," ultimately resulting in a group of fixed representatives... To put it plainly, who does governance tokens actually govern? Most of the time, it's about controlling lazy people who don't want to click a few times, and the time advantage of big holders. You delegate your vote, on the surface it's participation, but in reality, you're also handing over the power to set the agenda, which naturally leads to oligarchization.
My mom asked me a few days ago: "Isn