SpiralSeaSalt

Laughing to death, the level of absurdity is completely off the charts.

Lately I've been looking at a few more blockchain game pools, and the more I look, the more it feels like an old script: produce first to the max, everyone rushes in, and as a result, inflation suppresses the coin to the point of gasping for air. The pool looks lively with "revenue," but in reality, it's just borrowing against future buy orders. To put it simply, production is like paying wages, inflation is printing wages, and without new consumption scenarios to support it, in the end, only "who can run faster" remains. New L1/L2 projects launch incentives to boost TVL, and I can understand

I'm also watching PEPE; it usually reacts the fastest when sentiment warms up.

My biggest issue with spot trading is actually holding onto positions; as soon as prices go up, I want to cash out, and when they fall, I want to buy more. As a result, I keep flipping back and forth until I lose everything. Futures are even more ridiculous—once my position size gets large, I start dreaming, and if the market jitters, I get immediately educated. Honestly, position management boils down to one thing: don’t use “the money you must make a profit with” to gamble on volatility, treat every order as a small experiment where you can admit mistakes at any time. Recently, I’ve seen the

Recently, I’ve been looking at the APYs of a few yield aggregators again. The numbers look tempting, but my first reaction now isn’t “go for it,” but rather to check where the money is actually going: is it coming from lending pools or market making, are the contracts layered on top of each other, who holds the liquidation and pause permissions... In plain terms, APY often just hides “who the counterparty is” more deeply.
If I hadn’t paid more attention to the contract permissions at the time, I might have been led astray by words like “auto-compounding” or “strategy optimization,” only to rea