# 合约诈骗与虚假网站

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 Seeing the ZEROBASE case, the old saying still holds true—the pitfalls in the blockchain space are always repeatedly dug.
300,000 USDT was scammed on BSC, seemingly due to front-end imitation, but deeper down it reflects a well-verified pattern: user authorization is always the most vulnerable link. Remember the smart contract scams of 2017? The tactics were almost identical, just with smaller transaction volumes back then and less public attention. Now technology has advanced, but the tricks haven't changed—phishing pages, fake contracts, tricking users into granting permissions,

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 Seeing the $250,000 phishing incident involving ZEROBASE, I feel frustrated again. I’m all too familiar with this scam—front-end attacks, malicious contracts disguised convincingly, and users granting permissions that leave them completely vulnerable. The most painful part is that such incidents are fundamentally hard to prevent.
But there are a few details worth everyone remembering. First, the Vault contract on the BSC chain that managed to deceive so many people indicates that most users haven't even developed the habit of checking contract addresses. Comparing the address start

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 I just saw the warning from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, and I feel quite upset. Scammers impersonate official websites to induce transactions and even claim that taxes must be paid before withdrawal—I've seen this trick too many times. The Web3 world was originally created to give users more control and security, but instead, scammers are running rampant in this ecosystem, which is truly ironic.
I want to remind everyone of a few key points: **Official institutions will never proactively contact you to request transfers or account verification**—this is basic common sense. No

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 Recently, I saw the warning from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, and I feel a heavy weight in my heart. Scammers are getting increasingly cunning—they directly impersonate official websites, claim to be related to central bank digital currencies, and even invent reasons like "taxes must be paid before funds can be withdrawn" to trick people into transferring money.
I want to remind everyone of a few practical defenses: First, official institutions will never proactively ask you to transfer money or verify account information—that's a golden rule; second, any unfamiliar link is wo

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 Recently, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority issued an official warning about a major scam, where fraudsters impersonate official websites to induce trading, and even use excuses like taxes and account withdrawals to trick transfers. I have seen this kind of scam too many times. Here are some key points to identify them and avoid losing everything you've worked hard to earn.
**Three must-check items:**
1. Official channel verification — No financial institution will proactively contact you about finances. If you receive a suspicious link, first verify on the official website or offic

Oh my god, I almost got scammed just now!🥶
It was only after seeing the news about ZEROBASE that I realized how common front-end impersonation scams are. The phishing contract has already stolen $250,000 USDT, and hearing that number makes my scalp crawl. The most outrageous part is that the largest single loss was $123,000, which must be how many coins...
The key point is that I just realized I never thought about checking whether the website URL was correct when I authorized before!😅 This incident made me understand that even the front-end of seemingly legitimate projects can be attacked,

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 ZEROBASE's recent phishing incident is worth reviewing. 250,000 USDT lost, with a single loss of 123,000 — these are not small numbers.
Let me summarize the key points: front-end being impersonated, malicious contracts tricking users into granting permissions, users unknowingly giving USDT permissions to malicious actors — this process is quite old news, but people still fall for it every time. The most heartbreaking part is that these risks often occur when users are trying to participate in high-yield projects like yield farming and liquidity mining.
Friends who follow trading si

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 Damn, there's a new scam again! 🚨 The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has even come out to debunk it. Someone is forging official website pages to lure transactions and even demanding taxes before allowing withdrawals. This trick is absolutely clever...
Key points to remember:
✓ Official channels will never proactively ask you to transfer funds or verify your account
✓ If you receive a suspicious link, do not click it immediately. Verify on the official website first
✓ Any talk about "paying taxes to withdraw" is nonsense
The most outrageous part is that this kind of scam even uses o

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 The warning from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority is worth noting. The methods of impersonating official websites for scams are becoming increasingly sophisticated—cloning domain names, copying visual elements, fabricating tax fee reasons, and almost completely replicating official procedures to lower victims' guard. These cases reflect the scammers' profit models within the on-chain ecosystem: inducing users to transfer funds or authorize contracts via fake websites, with funds flowing directly into the scammers' wallets, then quickly cross-chain transferred or mixed.
From an on-c

#合约诈骗与虚假网站 Fake official website scams have appeared again, this time involving the Hong Kong Monetary Authority. The scammers are really getting more sophisticated, directly using official logos and even inventing reasons like "taxes must be paid to withdraw" to trick money out of people. I looked into their tactics, and basically, they lure you to a fake website and then ask for transfers under various pretenses.
Honestly, these types of scams are hard to defend against; the key is to stay vigilant. Just remember a few points: 1. The official will never ask you for money proactively; 2. Alw