Right now, the Web3 community is buzzing with "AI + Blockchain," but if you look closely, you'll find that most projects are just putting on a different coat. They use AI as a gimmick and slap it onto existing systems without real technical support at the core, let alone practical application scenarios. Only a few chains truly understand that to do AI right, you need to start considering it from the moment of architecture design.
Vanar Chain is such an example. This chain is designed from scratch specifically for AI, not an after-the-fact retrofit like some others. It integrates four core capabilities—semantic memory, on-chain reasoning, intelligent automation, and trusted settlement—directly into its five-layer foundational architecture, enabling AI agents to seamlessly collaborate with on-chain applications.
You ask, what's the difference? It's huge. The traditional approach is to add AI as an external plugin, which results in high latency, reliance on a bunch of third-party middleware, and increased risk of issues. Vanar's native design is fundamentally different.
More importantly, these tools are already usable. myNeutron solves the most frustrating problem with AI—poor memory. It provides decentralized semantic memory, completely changing the game. Kayon makes on-chain reasoning fully transparent and auditable; AI is no longer a black box decision-maker—every step is visible. Flows directly convert AI insights and suggestions into safe, reliable automated workflows that can actually get work done.
This isn't just something written in whitepapers; these tools are actively running. This is the correct way to combine AI and blockchain—not just hype, but real AI capabilities driving value flow within the ecosystem. Many projects are still just telling stories, but here, real work is already underway.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ser_ngmi
· 4h ago
Another "Designing AI from Scratch," I've heard it too many times... But this time, myNeutron and Kayon do have something; finally, someone is seriously working on the technology.
---
Sounds good, but wait, can it really be used or is it just a PPT?
---
Being welded into the architecture sounds impressive, but can it handle high traffic when actually running? That's the real question.
---
Alright, considering that myNeutron has solved AI forgetfulness, it's somewhat interesting.
---
Both Vanar and Flows, it feels like every week there's a chain promoting itself as "truly AI-native"... but I agree with making black-box decisions transparent.
---
Stop bragging, just ask—do you have real daily active user data? That's the truth.
---
Haha, reminds me of a project last time that also said it would "weld" features, and three months later, they were still fixing bugs. Is this time different?
---
Decentralized semantic memory sounds cool, but running it in practice would probably be prohibitively expensive...
---
Storytelling vs doing? Well, this is hinting at other projects again, but myNeutron definitely didn't boast; the demo is visible.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiAnon
· 4h ago
Wait, do these three tools really run online? Isn't it only on the testnet...
View OriginalReply0
CoconutWaterBoy
· 4h ago
Oops, someone finally said it—most projects are really just rebranded products.
Exactly, the difference between considering AI from the design stage and retrofitting later is huge; everyone who understands knows.
The semantic memory in myNeutron really addresses a pain point; the issue of poor AI memory has always been a trap.
The black-box decision-making process is really annoying; transparency like Kayon’s is definitely worth checking out.
Wait, are these tools really all running? Or is it just another round of PPT fundraising?
I need to take another look at the architecture; it feels a bit exaggerated, but it's much better than those pure concepts.
Vanar's approach of designing from scratch is the right way; it’s much better than retrofitting later.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 4h ago
Native design vs. retrofitting, the difference is really obvious at a glance. I respect Vanar's approach.
Right now, the Web3 community is buzzing with "AI + Blockchain," but if you look closely, you'll find that most projects are just putting on a different coat. They use AI as a gimmick and slap it onto existing systems without real technical support at the core, let alone practical application scenarios. Only a few chains truly understand that to do AI right, you need to start considering it from the moment of architecture design.
Vanar Chain is such an example. This chain is designed from scratch specifically for AI, not an after-the-fact retrofit like some others. It integrates four core capabilities—semantic memory, on-chain reasoning, intelligent automation, and trusted settlement—directly into its five-layer foundational architecture, enabling AI agents to seamlessly collaborate with on-chain applications.
You ask, what's the difference? It's huge. The traditional approach is to add AI as an external plugin, which results in high latency, reliance on a bunch of third-party middleware, and increased risk of issues. Vanar's native design is fundamentally different.
More importantly, these tools are already usable. myNeutron solves the most frustrating problem with AI—poor memory. It provides decentralized semantic memory, completely changing the game. Kayon makes on-chain reasoning fully transparent and auditable; AI is no longer a black box decision-maker—every step is visible. Flows directly convert AI insights and suggestions into safe, reliable automated workflows that can actually get work done.
This isn't just something written in whitepapers; these tools are actively running. This is the correct way to combine AI and blockchain—not just hype, but real AI capabilities driving value flow within the ecosystem. Many projects are still just telling stories, but here, real work is already underway.