2026-01-20 06:28:45

In the Solana ecosystem, Jito has established a foothold with its staking advantages, but it has obvious shortcomings in privacy protection. Dusk has taken a different approach—using the Phoenix protocol to encrypt the entire transaction process, combined with a selective disclosure mechanism to meet European MiCA compliance requirements. This is not just simple feature stacking, but precise positioning based on different market needs.

Dusk's toolkit is gradually improving. The Zedger beta version already supports the KYC issuance process, and Lightspeed L2 is also preparing for launch. From a product perspective, this combination can cover the core needs of compliant financial services in Europe.

Both paths have their advantages and disadvantages: Jito focuses on exploring Solana staking opportunities, while Dusk is targeting the blue ocean of European compliance. Currently, Dusk's market cap is still in the early stages. If compliance privacy tracks truly explode, the growth potential by 2026 could be much greater than current expectations. The key is to see how these new features are practically applied after implementation.

SOL-4,9%

JTO-5,2%

DUSK3,89%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractTester

· 5h ago

These two routes are indeed quite different. Jito has thoroughly understood the game of Solana, while Dusk is more betting on the European compliance angle, which hasn't fully exploded yet... Honestly, I find it hard to see if 2026 can really take off. Dusk's privacy solution sounds impressive, but how many projects are actually using it? That's the key, right? A low early market cap means high growth potential? I've always been skeptical of that logic... It mainly depends on whether users are willing to pay. Phoenix protocol combined with MiCA compliance sounds like it’s tailor-made for Europe, but I’m more curious whether Zedger’s launch will truly attract large funds. Achieving both compliance and privacy as a win-win is easier to say than to implement; it might not be that simple in practice. Jito’s staking advantage is indeed strong, but if Dusk really positions itself in European compliant finance... that might be a different dimension of competition? Let’s wait until Lightspeed L2 is actually launched before making predictions. It’s a bit early to forecast growth potential now.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 19h ago

European compliance确实是蓝海，但Dusk能不能吃到才是问题啊 --- Jito专注质押赚取，Dusk玩隐私合规，咋感觉各走各的路呢 --- 等等，Lightspeed L2真的能上吗？光说工具完善还不够啊 --- 说实话隐私+合规这个组合很难平衡，Dusk能做好才怪 --- 26年能爆发？先看看现在用户数据再说 --- Phoenix协议听起来不错，但欧洲监管那么严，风险也大啊 --- 早期市值低确实是机会，问题是会不会烂尾 --- 感觉又是个讲故事的项目，等产品真正用起来再信吧 --- Zedger支持KYC发行这事儿还挺有意思的 --- Dusk想做欧洲的事儿，结果可能被美国监管先掐死

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerProfit

· 19h ago

Dusk's approach is indeed interesting, focusing specifically on European compliance and truly finding a differentiation... but the key still depends on whether Zedger and L2 can actually be implemented, otherwise it's just a PPT project.

View OriginalReply0

DiamondHands

· 19h ago

Compliance and privacy are indeed a blue ocean, but whether Dusk can truly meet the demand from Europe depends on subsequent implementation. It's too early to draw conclusions.

View OriginalReply0

HappyMinerUncle

· 19h ago

Ha, the idea of Dusk is indeed interesting, specifically targeting the European compliance niche. Jito relies solely on Solana, but privacy is definitely a weakness. Let's wait until Zedger and L2 are truly launched; it's still too early. If the compliance and privacy track really takes off, early movers can definitely make a profit, but the key is implementation. Anyway, I'm just observing to see who can actually make these features work.

View OriginalReply0