Can DeFi protocols say goodbye to "code is law"? Is immutability verification really the ultimate security silver bullet?

robot
Abstract generation in progress

【BitPush】DeFi security remains a hot topic. a16z Crypto security researcher Daejun Park recently shared a viewpoint: instead of continuing to rely on the superstition that “code is law,” DeFi protocols might as well do something more pragmatic — making standards themselves into law.

His idea is actually easy to understand. By hardcoding security standards and immutability checks into the protocol, ensuring each transaction follows predefined rules, and automatically reverting once a red line is triggered. Park believes this mechanism can handle almost all known code vulnerabilities, making it even harder for hackers to exploit during execution.

That said, reality can be a bit harsh. According to Slowmist data, last year hackers stole over $649 million through code vulnerabilities. Even established protocols like Balancer, which has been running since 2021, suffered a loss of $128 million last November due to code bugs. What’s more frustrating for developers is that hackers are now starting to use AI to find vulnerabilities, which means traditional audits may need to be upgraded.

However, this “immutability check” solution isn’t a panacea. Immunefi’s security lead pointed out a key issue: it will increase gas costs, and higher costs scare users away. Additionally, co-founder of Asymmetric Research mentioned a real dilemma — many vulnerabilities are too complex, and writing rules that can accurately detect attacks without false positives is no easy task.

It seems that the path to DeFi security still requires ongoing exploration. While defending against hackers and AI, developers also need to consider user experience and economic benefits — indeed, it’s a tricky game.

DEFI-2%
BAL-1,88%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiGraylingvip
· 9h ago
Code is law, it should have been abolished long ago, and this time Park finally said it out loud. Immutability checks sound great in theory, but what about in practice? $649 million speaks, brother.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkievip
· 9h ago
The idea that "code is law" should have been discarded long ago; it still relies on regulations as a safety net... However, Park's idea sounds easy to say but hard to implement.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 9h ago
*sigh* empirically speaking, Park's framing is just governance theater with a technical coat of paint. the data suggests immutability checks are band-aids on a fundamentally flawed architecture—you can't legislate your way out of poor incentive design. Balancer's $128M hack kinda proves the point, no?
Reply0
StrawberryIcevip
· 9h ago
Is invariance checking just another silver bullet? Just listen, hackers have already devised countermeasures.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMinervip
· 9h ago
Coming back with this set again? Is immutability check the silver bullet? I think it's a myth. What does the $649 million say?
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 9h ago
The saying "Code is law" should have been overturned long ago; the reality is right there... $649 million lost in vain, who will take responsibility?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)