Ponzi schemes cannot be saved by gradual contraction. This is a fundamental logical issue in the market — when the underlying growth stalls, no matter how adjustments are made, the collapse fate cannot be changed.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropworkerZhang
· 10h ago
In plain terms, it's like hot potato; someone has to be the one to take the final turn in the end.
View OriginalReply0
DeadTrades_Walking
· 10h ago
Basically, it's just robbing Peter to pay Paul; sooner or later, it will collapse. There's no point arguing about this logic.
View OriginalReply0
NFTBlackHole
· 10h ago
Well said, the ultimate fate of those who harvest the little guys is like this; sooner or later, they'll crash.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 10h ago
The underlying growth has stopped, which means there's no arbitrage opportunity in the mempool. No matter how fancy the mechanism design is, it can't save the deterioration of the fundamentals, just like optimizing gas fees can't save a chain that no one uses. To put it simply, this is the inevitable outcome of a growth-driven Ponzi scheme.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 10h ago
In simple terms, if the underlying growth isn't there, everything else is pointless. The principle is as simple as a water pump — no matter how you turn the pipe above, you can't save a well with no water.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrine
· 10h ago
I should have known earlier, after harvesting the leeks, you still want a soft landing? Dream on.
Ponzi schemes cannot be saved by gradual contraction. This is a fundamental logical issue in the market — when the underlying growth stalls, no matter how adjustments are made, the collapse fate cannot be changed.