After a significant correction in Ethereum, the market has fallen into a strange silence.



Recently, after this wave of market movement, the trading scene feels as if it has been frozen. Long leverage positions have been nearly wiped out, while shorts are still in the lead but dare not continue to push. There is a huge gap between the bulls and bears that no one is willing to fill. Is there any profit in it? No. Therefore, whether it's long or short funds, everyone is now on the sidelines, waiting for the next clear signal of direction.

Behind this silence is actually a psychological standoff—bulls are afraid of bottoming out in the middle of the move, and bears dare not chase aggressively. The market is stuck at this equilibrium point, with no one willing to break this fragile deadlock first.

At this moment when the entire internet is holding its breath, Lista DAO has released an ambitious plan for 2026, aiming to upgrade from a simple lending tool to a comprehensive DeFi infrastructure. This move is quite eye-catching.

Specifically, Lista DAO has outlined four main directions: establishing a stablecoin trading hub, launching tokenized government bonds and corporate debt products, building an on-chain credit system, and developing yield products based on prediction markets. The project has already launched a real assets platform on BNB Chain, allowing users to directly invest in US Treasury bonds and corporate loan products with USDT, earning stable returns. To boost confidence, the team has permanently burned 20% of the token supply, capping the total at 800 million tokens.

It should be noted that the code audit for this project is not comprehensive, and its security score is relatively low, which is a risk point. Market opinions on it are also divided—some see it as a pragmatic application of "financial Lego," while others believe it overpromises and exceeds its actual execution capability.

However, from a strategic perspective, Lista DAO’s move is indeed aimed at breaking the limitations of single-functionality by expanding into an ecosystem to seize the position of DeFi infrastructure. Initiating such an action during the market’s wait-and-see period clearly aims to gain a first-mover advantage.
ETH-3,46%
LISTA-7,53%
BNB-2,37%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentTherapistvip
· 4h ago
Oh no, it's the same old story—destroy tokens to boost confidence. I just want to ask, has the audit really passed? Another project trying to do DeFi Lego, it's good enough if it can actually be implemented in the end. Making big moves during the silence period, I understand the gambler's mentality, just worried about making the wrong bet. Lista wants to rise to the top with real effort; just bragging won't do. The market has frozen, and you guys are still expanding wildly. Your courage is really bold, haha. The issue of incomplete code audits—why are more and more projects like this? Let's wait and see about execution. Right now, any words are just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedianvip
· 4h ago
The Dragon Slayer少年最终变成了恶龙,Lista DAO this move确实有点绝。 Both bulls and bears are pretending to be dead, and as a result, they directly opened a new track, which is called "I won't play with you." However, with such poor code auditing, I still feel a bit uneasy, as if adding an extra layer of gambling on top of throwing a tantrum.
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpavip
· 5h ago
nah the 20% burn is just security theater tbh... token velocity trap waiting to happen once they actually scale this thing
Reply0
SmartMoneyWalletvip
· 5h ago
Burning 20% of the supply... Tsk, a classic confidence game. The total of 800 million tokens sounds neat, but what about the actual on-chain circulation data? Has anyone looked into it? Incomplete code audits immediately trigger alarms. These days, there are many projects daring to launch RWA on BNB, but few can actually run smoothly. Basically, it depends on whose funding can support it. After the observation period, they start to hype the opportunity. I want to see how the subsequent financing data turns out. What really matters is the on-chain liquidity and distribution of holdings—don't be fooled by the grand narrative of the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologistvip
· 5h ago
Oh no, it's the same scam with these altcoins again. Low safety scores but still dare to release a 2026 plan? I think they're just trying to cash in during the market lull. Everyone is watching the direction, but they dare to boast. Burning 20% of tokens to boost confidence? Nice words, but it's just the same old trick. This market is frozen solid, just the right opportunity for these project teams to fish in troubled waters. DeFi infrastructure? Wake up, they haven't even passed audits, and they're still dreaming about this. If you really want stable returns, why not go straight to CeFi? Why come to blockchain just to get cut?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)