2026-01-19 03:38:33

FEDERAL AGENCY PRACTICES UNDER SCRUTINY

A troubling pattern emerges in major criminal investigations: cases involving 14 suspects where 12 are working directly with federal authorities, leaving only 2 actual suspects. The question becomes—when the majority of a conspiracy consists of government informants, who's actually driving the operation?

This structure raises serious concerns. Are undercover operatives genuinely uncovering criminal plots, or are they actively recruiting and encouraging participants? When most participants have official handlers, the line between investigation and entrainment blurs considerably.

Such practices deserve scrutiny. Regulatory bodies and oversight committees should examine whether aggressive undercover tactics inadvertently create the very crimes they claim to prevent. The integrity of the justice system depends on clear distinctions between detecting crimes and manufacturing them.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShibaSunglasses

· 6h ago

This data is outrageous. 12 informants and only 2 suspects. What’s the point of investigating further? ``` ``` Is this real? Isn’t this just self-directed and self-acted? Playing new tricks in sting operations. ``` ``` Wait, this logic doesn’t add up... Are those undercover agents creating cases themselves and then "solving" them? ``` ``` The judicial system’s tricks need to be changed; it has become a production line for manufacturing crimes. ``` ``` Are there more undercover agents than real offenders? I laughed. This is just ridiculous. ``` ``` Here’s the question: who supervises these supervisors... ``` ``` Having too many informants actually messes things up. Isn’t that missing the forest for the trees? ``` ``` No wonder I always felt some cases had a strange smell. Now I see how it’s done. ``` ``` In plain terms, it’s about overstepping authority. If no crime can be found, they create one themselves. ``` ``` This kind of investigation method needs to be stopped. It’s playing with fire.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 6h ago

12 informants, 2 suspects, isn't this just an official staged show? --- Wait, if that's the case, who can believe that the federal investigation is genuine... --- Basically, it's about creating crimes to solve crimes. This routine is played out. --- More informants than actual criminals, this operation is truly outrageous. --- Inducement + informants, this is not investigation, it's a trap. --- Laughing to death, most of them are their own people, so who are they actually investigating? --- If one or two informants can be brainwashed, the federal methods are indeed effective. --- Even laypeople can see that this is a script they wrote from start to finish.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 6h ago

Isn't this just the tactic of "creating risks and then fixing them yourself," similar to the poor governance of some protocols? Wait, 12 out of 14 suspects are informants? This data just doesn't add up. The federal law enforcement playing this game feels even more ruthless than a liquidity mining rug pull. Basically, it's entrapment law enforcement—question is, are they catching real criminals or just raising their own fish? This logic is a bit like pumping up the price to sell high, then claiming market manipulation. It's really "I create the conspiracy, then I break the conspiracy," anyone who sees it will be caught off guard. This law enforcement system isn't even as transparent as on-chain transactions.

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 6h ago

Damn, only 2 real suspects caught out of 12 informants? Isn't this just doing your own thing and catching yourselves? Basically, it's entrapment. Who can't see through this trick? Really? Were those 2 actual suspects really framed? So here's the question: are they solving the case or just staging a show? This judicial process feels all wrong, like the entire system is broken. Government informants outnumber actual suspects—laughable. This is like putting on a play.

View OriginalReply0