Source: TokocryptoBlog
Original Title: RUU CLARITY Act Enters Critical Phase, DeFi and Stablecoin Take Center Stage
Original Link:
The discussion of the US (RUU) crypto bill, the CLARITY Act, has entered a crucial phase after senators proposed 137 amendments ahead of the markup process in the Senate Banking Committee. Issues surrounding stablecoin (yield) returns and DeFi regulation have become the main points of contention that could determine the future direction of crypto regulation.
The 278-page draft of the CLARITY Act was released on Monday night local time, after five months of bipartisan discussions. Most industry players in crypto only saw the full document on Tuesday. The deadline for submitting amendments, which falls at 17:00 on the same day, triggered a surge in proposed changes from various senators.
Stablecoin Yield Becomes the Most Debated Issue
One of the most heated debates concerns the provision of yield on stablecoins. Senators Angela Alsobrooks and Thom Tillis proposed bipartisan amendments to clarify which activities allow users to earn returns. The goal is to clearly define the boundary between permitted yield models and structures that are considered to violate regulations.
This issue is deemed crucial because it directly affects the business models of stablecoin issuers and could have significant impacts on the broader crypto market.
DeFi Under Scrutiny After Industry Pressure
In addition to stablecoins, decentralized finance (DeFi) also comes under the spotlight. Senators Pete Ricketts and Cynthia Lummis proposed revisions to DeFi regulation language following industry rejection of new clauses perceived to create legal uncertainty for decentralized protocols.
This move aims to allay fears that new regulations could treat DeFi protocols as centralized entities.
Ethics of Officials and Warren Amendments
Senator Chris Van Hollen proposed measures to prevent government officials from profiting from crypto businesses, including anti-touting rules requiring disclosure of financial interests for those promoting crypto assets.
However, some of these ethics amendments are not expected to be decided immediately during the markup stage, given the limited authority of the Senate Banking Committee. The issue is likely to be discussed in later stages in the Senate.
Meanwhile, Senator Elizabeth Warren heightened tensions by submitting more than 20 amendments, including proposals to ban stablecoin yields entirely and efforts to revoke the pro-crypto guidance issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) last year.
Markup as the Key to Regulatory Direction
Some amendments even go beyond crypto substance. For example, Senator Jack Reed proposed amendments supporting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell amid the Department of Justice investigation, indicating that the markup process is also used for broader political messaging.
Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the White House Crypto Council, stated that ethical provisions will be added after the bill passes the committee and before the full Senate vote, signaling potential further changes.
On the other hand, Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman announced rescheduling the markup to target January 27, with the latest draft of the bill expected to be released a week earlier.
With hundreds of amendments submitted, the outcome of the CLARITY Act markup is predicted to be a decisive factor in how significantly it will impact the industry and the global crypto markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 12h ago
The Clarity Act is back, with 137 amendments? Can we please not cut DeFi this time...
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 01-19 22:53
137 amendments? Oh no, this is going to be explosive. Both DeFi and stablecoins are going to be scrutinized thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-19 01:59
137 amendments? Oh my, how long will this take...
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 01-19 01:57
The Clarity Act is back. Is this time really the moment to define it?
View OriginalReply0
notSatoshi1971
· 01-19 01:52
Another 137 amendments? The speed of these regulations is as slow as a snail, DeFi and stablecoins have long been impatient.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 01-19 01:46
137 amendments? Now DeFi and stablecoins have to be fussed over, and the gamble of 5 SOL will have to be postponed for a few more months.
View OriginalReply0
rugpull_survivor
· 01-19 01:44
137 amendments? Oh my, this is playing with fire. DeFi will have to be messed with again.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWatcher
· 01-19 01:37
137 amendments? Are they planning to heavily regulate DeFi and stablecoins? I'm a bit worried.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssues
· 01-19 01:36
137 amendments? Oh my, this is just playing with words... Is DeFi really going to fade away?
RUU CLARITY Act Enters Critical Phase, DeFi and Stablecoins Become the Spotlight
Source: TokocryptoBlog Original Title: RUU CLARITY Act Enters Critical Phase, DeFi and Stablecoin Take Center Stage Original Link: The discussion of the US (RUU) crypto bill, the CLARITY Act, has entered a crucial phase after senators proposed 137 amendments ahead of the markup process in the Senate Banking Committee. Issues surrounding stablecoin (yield) returns and DeFi regulation have become the main points of contention that could determine the future direction of crypto regulation.
The 278-page draft of the CLARITY Act was released on Monday night local time, after five months of bipartisan discussions. Most industry players in crypto only saw the full document on Tuesday. The deadline for submitting amendments, which falls at 17:00 on the same day, triggered a surge in proposed changes from various senators.
Stablecoin Yield Becomes the Most Debated Issue
One of the most heated debates concerns the provision of yield on stablecoins. Senators Angela Alsobrooks and Thom Tillis proposed bipartisan amendments to clarify which activities allow users to earn returns. The goal is to clearly define the boundary between permitted yield models and structures that are considered to violate regulations.
This issue is deemed crucial because it directly affects the business models of stablecoin issuers and could have significant impacts on the broader crypto market.
DeFi Under Scrutiny After Industry Pressure
In addition to stablecoins, decentralized finance (DeFi) also comes under the spotlight. Senators Pete Ricketts and Cynthia Lummis proposed revisions to DeFi regulation language following industry rejection of new clauses perceived to create legal uncertainty for decentralized protocols.
This move aims to allay fears that new regulations could treat DeFi protocols as centralized entities.
Ethics of Officials and Warren Amendments
Senator Chris Van Hollen proposed measures to prevent government officials from profiting from crypto businesses, including anti-touting rules requiring disclosure of financial interests for those promoting crypto assets.
However, some of these ethics amendments are not expected to be decided immediately during the markup stage, given the limited authority of the Senate Banking Committee. The issue is likely to be discussed in later stages in the Senate.
Meanwhile, Senator Elizabeth Warren heightened tensions by submitting more than 20 amendments, including proposals to ban stablecoin yields entirely and efforts to revoke the pro-crypto guidance issued by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) last year.
Markup as the Key to Regulatory Direction
Some amendments even go beyond crypto substance. For example, Senator Jack Reed proposed amendments supporting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell amid the Department of Justice investigation, indicating that the markup process is also used for broader political messaging.
Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the White House Crypto Council, stated that ethical provisions will be added after the bill passes the committee and before the full Senate vote, signaling potential further changes.
On the other hand, Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman announced rescheduling the markup to target January 27, with the latest draft of the bill expected to be released a week earlier.
With hundreds of amendments submitted, the outcome of the CLARITY Act markup is predicted to be a decisive factor in how significantly it will impact the industry and the global crypto markets.