It's 2026 now. Solana has grown to 800+ validators running the network. Yet some Layer 2 developers keep churning out threads dissecting Solana's decentralization metrics—while their own sequencers remain the single point of failure anchoring their entire ecosystem. The irony writes itself.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DecentralizeMe
· 3h ago
Those people in L2 still have the nerve to diss Solana? Their own sequencer is still a single point of failure, aren't they too fragile?
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 3h ago
Those guys in L2 are really something. They keep obsessing over Solana's centralization issues every day, but isn't their own sequencer just a ticking time bomb?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkie
· 3h ago
Playing around is one thing, but these L2 projects are really just talking here. Their own sequencer is a huge bug, and they still have the nerve to criticize others?
View OriginalReply0
ThatsNotARugPull
· 3h ago
L2 developers are really upset; they think a single sequencer wants to teach Solana about decentralization?
View OriginalReply0
RektCoaster
· 3h ago
L2s are talking about decentralization there, but their own sequencers are just grasshoppers on the same rope, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 3h ago
Bro, your comment is really on point. The L2 folks don't even bother with drafts before mirror reflection.
It's 2026 now. Solana has grown to 800+ validators running the network. Yet some Layer 2 developers keep churning out threads dissecting Solana's decentralization metrics—while their own sequencers remain the single point of failure anchoring their entire ecosystem. The irony writes itself.