2026-01-18 02:24:42

Is it technically possible for XCU developers to configure the protocol's fee distribution mechanism to redirect collected fees toward external addresses or historical figures as a governance experiment? What are the smart contract constraints here?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ConsensusDissenter

· 10h ago

Haha, the issue of XCU's fee reallocation... To be honest, I think there's nothing technically impossible about it, but the real question is, why do it? Isn't this just digging your own grave?

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9f682d4c

· 10h ago

Can the fee mechanism be changed arbitrarily? It depends on how the contract is written. It feels like this question is a bit of a presumptive assumption...

View OriginalReply0

HallucinationGrower

· 10h ago

Huh? Redirecting fees to a historical figure's address? That's a pretty wild idea. How would on-chain verification of ancient people's identities work...

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 10h ago

Hmm, this question is interesting. Theoretically, of course, it can be changed, it just depends on how the contract is written... But it would be a bit ridiculous to point to a historical figure's address, haha.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleShadow

· 10h ago

Cost redirection sounds very appealing, but the on-chain contract hurdle is probably stuck... overthinking it.

View OriginalReply0

MoonMathMagic

· 11h ago

Hey, that's a pretty magical idea—sending governance fees to historical figures? But on the other hand, smart contract restrictions are definitely going to be tightly locked down. Is it even possible to bypass them?

View OriginalReply0