Brothers, my name is Lao Zhang. In the crypto circle over the past ten years, I've seen it all. Today, I want to openly talk with you about the 2026 market, especially those investment choices that you love and hate at the same time.
To be honest, I've been a bit speechless about the market lately. Many projects have no real technology, yet their PPTs are flashy; product experiences are terrible, but they still throw huge budgets into marketing. Every day they shout about "mass adoption," but what’s the result? New users can’t even find the entrance, and the barriers are set higher than the sky. This kind of "inflated prices on paper, but water and soil don’t adapt in actual application" routine—how long can it fool people? Our hard-earned money doesn’t grow on trees; we must keep our eyes open.
But amidst this noisy environment, I found an interesting "honest guy"—NEAR. This guy is quietly working away.
I’ve been watching it for three years. At first, I didn’t think it would stand out much. But this guy really has patience, never follows trends or hype, and doesn’t do any虚的 stuff. It focuses all its energy on one thing: how to make Web3 experience as smooth as scrolling through short videos. With this persistence and pragmatism, if I don’t pay attention to it now, I might regret it next year, tearing my hair out.
Why am I so confident in NEAR? Let me analyze my observations for you.
First, the foundation must be solid. Blockchain, to put it simply, still depends on technology. If the underlying architecture collapses, everything built on top is useless. NEAR’s sharding technology is genuinely developed with effort; it’s not just a concept in whitepapers that sounds impressive but can’t run in reality. This is precisely the fundamental difference between it and many "conceptual players."
Second, they are not thinking about how to cut a quick profit, but how to let ordinary users truly use it. This long-term attitude is quite rare in the crypto world. It’s 2026 now, and the big waves of淘沙 have already begun. Projects that rely on虚套 are cooling off, and only those with real strength and responsibility will survive until the end.
Ultimately, instead of chasing projects that change stories and repackage concepts every day, it’s better to focus on those that are actually doing things. The market will ultimately look at products, applications, and whether they solve real problems. As for NEAR, I think it’s worth paying attention to.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MergeConflict
· 5h ago
Old Zhang's analysis this time really woke people up. Projects with beautiful PPTs but poor technology should have been phased out long ago.
I've been watching NEAR for the past three years. It’s truly a quiet but profitable type, unlike some that constantly release posters.
I'm just worried that by 2026, new concepts will emerge to cut leeks again, but projects that genuinely improve the experience are indeed worth a gamble.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorker
· 5h ago
Old Zhang, your words really hit home. Indeed, a bunch of projects are just dream-creating with PPTs, and user experience is terribly bad.
I've also been paying attention to NEAR. The technical strength is definitely there, but the ecosystem development is a bit slow.
Wait, is the sharding solution you mentioned really implemented successfully? It still feels a bit uncertain...
Forget it, compared to those things that keep changing their stories every day, it's more reliable to focus on doing solid work.
Old Zhang, let's just wait and see in 2026.
View OriginalReply0
MidsommarWallet
· 5h ago
Old Zhang's analysis this time really hit the mark. Projects with beautiful PPTs but garbage products should really be cleaned out.
NEAR's three years of silence is indeed interesting, unlike some coins that shout slogans every day.
The technical stack explanation is reasonable; if the underlying infrastructure isn't stable, everything else is just superficial.
In the market's big washout, this wave truly reveals who is serious about their work.
Most projects are still just telling stories, but NEAR is really focused on coding.
All the nice promises are just tricks to cut leeks in the end.
This long-term attitude is indeed rare in the crypto world; I need to pay more attention.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHustler
· 5h ago
Old Zhang's words really hit me in the heart. There are truly countless projects with beautiful PPTs but terrible technology.
NEAR is indeed quiet, but I'm a bit worried whether the ecosystem and user base can keep up.
I'm just afraid it will be another situation where the technology is excellent but no one uses the product.
If this wave really takes off, those who buy in early should seize the opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 5h ago
Old Zhang's words really hit the nail on the head; the PPT king truly deserves to be out of the spotlight.
View OriginalReply0
FantasyGuardian
· 5h ago
Old Zhang's words really hit the nail on the head. Currently, project teams are busy creating dreams with PPTs every day, and the user experience is terribly bad.
NEAR is indeed working quietly without blowing smoke, and I agree with that.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHunter
· 6h ago
Old Zhang's analysis is indeed insightful. After getting tired of those PPT kings, those who work quietly like NEAR seem to be truly scarce.
This market indeed needs a big wave to sift out the chaff; the fake ones should have been gone long ago.
But to say that solid technology alone can guarantee victory? User adoption rate is the real key. Good technology without users is pointless.
Sharding solutions sound promising, but how do they perform in practice? Are there specific data?
I agree with long-termism, but there are really few who can be patient in this circle. Let's see if NEAR can hold up for a few years.
Brothers, my name is Lao Zhang. In the crypto circle over the past ten years, I've seen it all. Today, I want to openly talk with you about the 2026 market, especially those investment choices that you love and hate at the same time.
To be honest, I've been a bit speechless about the market lately. Many projects have no real technology, yet their PPTs are flashy; product experiences are terrible, but they still throw huge budgets into marketing. Every day they shout about "mass adoption," but what’s the result? New users can’t even find the entrance, and the barriers are set higher than the sky. This kind of "inflated prices on paper, but water and soil don’t adapt in actual application" routine—how long can it fool people? Our hard-earned money doesn’t grow on trees; we must keep our eyes open.
But amidst this noisy environment, I found an interesting "honest guy"—NEAR. This guy is quietly working away.
I’ve been watching it for three years. At first, I didn’t think it would stand out much. But this guy really has patience, never follows trends or hype, and doesn’t do any虚的 stuff. It focuses all its energy on one thing: how to make Web3 experience as smooth as scrolling through short videos. With this persistence and pragmatism, if I don’t pay attention to it now, I might regret it next year, tearing my hair out.
Why am I so confident in NEAR? Let me analyze my observations for you.
First, the foundation must be solid. Blockchain, to put it simply, still depends on technology. If the underlying architecture collapses, everything built on top is useless. NEAR’s sharding technology is genuinely developed with effort; it’s not just a concept in whitepapers that sounds impressive but can’t run in reality. This is precisely the fundamental difference between it and many "conceptual players."
Second, they are not thinking about how to cut a quick profit, but how to let ordinary users truly use it. This long-term attitude is quite rare in the crypto world. It’s 2026 now, and the big waves of淘沙 have already begun. Projects that rely on虚套 are cooling off, and only those with real strength and responsibility will survive until the end.
Ultimately, instead of chasing projects that change stories and repackage concepts every day, it’s better to focus on those that are actually doing things. The market will ultimately look at products, applications, and whether they solve real problems. As for NEAR, I think it’s worth paying attention to.