2026-01-15 06:50:56

#Strategy加仓BTC Looking at this wave of $BTC market, I really can't hold on anymore. For those who bought in at high levels, you probably understand that feeling — thinking you were safe once you got on board, only to be hit with being the high-level bagholder.

That's just how the market is; greed often comes with the highest price. Especially for friends who are passionate about Chinese coins and small-cap tokens, I have to be honest: most of these assets are just tools to give early holders money, and retail investors are basically set up to be cut.

While mainstream coins like Bitcoin are also volatile, they at least have market consensus and liquidity. If you want to survive in this market, instead of chasing after concept tokens in the Chinese community, it's better to focus on top assets like Bitcoin. Yes, the volatility is high, but at least the losses are clear, and you won't be fooled by project teams into losing everything.

Having gone through a few altcoin pitfalls, I’ve truly learned my lesson.

BTC-2,21%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MrDecoder

· 6h ago

Taking over at a high position is really uncomfortable, but it's true that sticking to mainstream coins is more reliable.

View OriginalReply0

PumpBeforeRug

· 8h ago

The experienced bagholder shares their story from the top—this blood and tears history --- Are you again advising me to give up on small coins? I just want to know why BTC is dropping so hard --- Sounds nice, but isn't it also caught in the trap? Who hasn't suffered losses --- Chinese coins are indeed a trap, but BTC isn't doing well either, buddy --- I've learned my lesson, I've learned my lesson, next time I'll still chase the high, can't change that --- This is the so-called market consensus, in plain terms, it's still gambling with luck --- Listen to you, next time I'll go all in on BTC, then keep losing --- After living so long, I understand one thing: whether you're cut or not, it's all tuition --- Really can't hold it? Sell then, talking without action is useless, right

View OriginalReply0

TokenTherapist

· 14h ago

The high-level bagholder shares his experience, this time he's truly hooked After being cut countless times, I finally realize that BTC is the most reliable Stop messing around with small coins, they are all just tricks to scam chives That hits too close to home, I also bought in at a high level, now I’m enduring every day Mainstream coins are more reliable than wild chicken coins, this is a lesson learned by throwing money The Chinese coin scene really is deceptive, no one cares when you lose money You only understand after experiencing it, now I only watch BTC, nothing unnecessary to touch

View OriginalReply0

New_Ser_Ngmi

· 14h ago

The high-level bagholder can now only buy the dip; there's no other way.

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 14h ago

Getting in at a high level, what a bloody lesson, bro. --- That's right, the Chinese crypto playbook is just a harvesting machine. I've also fallen into that trap. --- Wait, are you really going all in on BTC? With such big fluctuations, you can't hold on either. --- I've learned my lesson, for sure, but next time I’ll probably forget again haha. --- This round was really tough, time to reflect and think it over. --- Mainstream coins are stable, but making money isn't that fast, can't compare to the quick double-ups of small-cap coins. --- I just want to ask, when did you sell? Or are you still holding?

View OriginalReply0

OldLeekNewSickle

· 14h ago

The pain of taking over at a high position, I understand. It's just that after seeing through the leek-cutting mechanism, I still have to choose the one where losing money feels more reassuring.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerGas

· 14h ago

High-level bagholders, to put it simply, are a brutal lesson in the market efficiency hypothesis in practice. The Chinese coin system is indeed a classic Ponzi game structure, and retail investors entered when the Nash equilibrium was already at its end. I actually think this loss was worth it, as the tuition paid for a better understanding of the market microstructure.

View OriginalReply0