The index giant MSCI recently decided not to implement the proposal to remove Digital Asset Trust Companies (DATCOs) from global indices in its quarterly review in February 2026. What does this decision mean? Simply put, publicly traded companies with heavy Bitcoin holdings like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) have temporarily avoided the risk of potentially billions of dollars in passive fund outflows caused by such removals.
Following the announcement, Strategy's stock price surged over 6% after hours, clearly easing market concerns. But this is not an unconditional victory.
MSCI, while announcing the suspension of the removal, also issued a key move: freezing the circulating share count of these companies in the index. In plain language, future share issuances by such companies will no longer be included in the index weight calculations. The cycle of "share issuance - automatic index fund buying - stock price rise," which once existed, is now broken.
The chain reaction of this event is quite interesting:
In the short term, companies can finally breathe a sigh of relief and are not in such a rush to respond to forced sell-offs. But in the long run, the previous approach of large-scale Bitcoin accumulation through equity financing is now essentially unfeasible. Companies must return to their core strength—their actual operational capabilities.
Even more interestingly, this indirectly increases the attractiveness of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Institutional funds that previously allocated to DATCOs stocks may now prefer simpler structured spot Bitcoin ETF products, as these do not carry the complex policy risks associated with listed companies.
MSCI also stated that it will initiate broader market consultations on the definition of "non-operational enterprises." In other words, the debate over how to integrate crypto assets into the traditional financial system is far from over. The game between rule makers and market participants will continue.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunter
· 6h ago
Liquidity freeze, arbitrage opportunities disappear. This is MSCI's true purpose.
---
In simple terms, the previous "automatic weighting increase" arbitrage loop is now dead, and you can no longer easily earn that light profit.
---
Index funds no longer receive new weightings, so these companies can only rely on genuine profits moving forward. I am optimistic about this turning point.
---
Spot BTC ETF has won big, with a clear structure and no policy risks. Institutional capital migration is only a matter of time.
---
MSCI's move actually forced the market to reorganize its efficiency, which is quite interesting.
---
After the cycle of DATCOs' issuance is broken, the real test is which company's Bitcoin purchasing strategy is the most elegant. This is the beginning of differentiated competition.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuy
· 6h ago
Huh, the trick of issuing more tokens is now useless. Now we have to work for real.
View OriginalReply0
NotGonnaMakeIt
· 6h ago
This is truly Schrödinger's victory, with a knife stabbed in the waist.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPhantom
· 6h ago
Really, MSCI's move to freeze circulating share weights is essentially choking off the supply. It seems to have saved MSTR's life, but in reality, it's cutting off the root.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 6h ago
Oh my, this MSCI wave is really both giving candy and whipping, Strategy dodged a blow but can no longer rely on issuing new shares to milk the index funds, the long-term gameplay is completely rewritten.
The index giant MSCI recently decided not to implement the proposal to remove Digital Asset Trust Companies (DATCOs) from global indices in its quarterly review in February 2026. What does this decision mean? Simply put, publicly traded companies with heavy Bitcoin holdings like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) have temporarily avoided the risk of potentially billions of dollars in passive fund outflows caused by such removals.
Following the announcement, Strategy's stock price surged over 6% after hours, clearly easing market concerns. But this is not an unconditional victory.
MSCI, while announcing the suspension of the removal, also issued a key move: freezing the circulating share count of these companies in the index. In plain language, future share issuances by such companies will no longer be included in the index weight calculations. The cycle of "share issuance - automatic index fund buying - stock price rise," which once existed, is now broken.
The chain reaction of this event is quite interesting:
In the short term, companies can finally breathe a sigh of relief and are not in such a rush to respond to forced sell-offs. But in the long run, the previous approach of large-scale Bitcoin accumulation through equity financing is now essentially unfeasible. Companies must return to their core strength—their actual operational capabilities.
Even more interestingly, this indirectly increases the attractiveness of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Institutional funds that previously allocated to DATCOs stocks may now prefer simpler structured spot Bitcoin ETF products, as these do not carry the complex policy risks associated with listed companies.
MSCI also stated that it will initiate broader market consultations on the definition of "non-operational enterprises." In other words, the debate over how to integrate crypto assets into the traditional financial system is far from over. The game between rule makers and market participants will continue.