2026-01-19 21:34:42

The head of one of the world's largest asset managers just highlighted a critical tension: capitalism is hemorrhaging public confidence and the system needs fundamental transformation.

Why does this matter for us? Traditional finance has built its entire foundation on institutional trust—the assumption that regulators, central banks, and corporations will act responsibly. When that social contract breaks down, people start looking elsewhere.

This is precisely the problem blockchain technology was designed to solve. Instead of trusting intermediaries, we verify. Instead of opaque systems, we get transparency. Instead of centralized control, we get distributed consensus.

The gap between Wall Street's awareness of these problems and their willingness to actually adapt remains massive. But the more mainstream figures acknowledge that the current financial architecture is losing legitimacy, the more rational it becomes to explore alternatives.

The evolution of capitalism might look a lot like the evolution of trust itself—moving from institutional promises to cryptographic proof, from centralized gatekeeping to open protocols.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugpullSurvivor

· 6h ago

Uh, traditional finance is only realizing this now? We've known it all along. --- It's the same old "trust crisis" rhetoric, but how many are actually taking action? --- from institutional promises to cryptographic proof This statement is perfect; it's the very reason Web3 should exist. --- Wall Street: "We know the problem" doesn't mean they really want to change, right? They're just protecting their own cake. --- Wait, this guy manages such a large amount of funds, and he's still here saying "reform is needed"... where are the actions?

View OriginalReply0

ForkInTheRoad

· 6h ago

The trust system of traditional finance was always a house of cards and should have collapsed long ago. Blockchain isn't a savior, but at least it makes the rules of the game transparent, and that's the key. --- Wall Street folks, they know the problem exists but don't want to really change, still hoping to continue profiting from the old ways. --- From institutional promises to cryptographic proofs, it sounds ideal, but how many years will it really take to transform? Anyway, I don't want to wait anymore. --- That's right, but the problem is most people don't even realize they're being exploited by intermediaries, and they still have to use their systems. What can be done? --- Ha, so in the end, it's still the wealthy who get to use truly decentralized stuff first, while the poor continue to be exploited? That's so ironic.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 6h ago

Basically, people within the system also know that the rules are completely broken, but there's no way to change them. So we've long since switched to on-chain verification, right?

View OriginalReply0

ZenZKPlayer

· 6h ago

Nah, traditional finance knows where the problem is, but they just can't fix it... That's the most heartbreaking part.

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 6h ago

Hmm... finally, this big shot has spoken out. Traditional finance is just a trust game. If the rules of the game are broken, it's over. When trust collapses, people start looking to the blockchain. The logic makes sense, but will that bunch on Wall Street really change? I doubt it. From institutional promises to cryptographic proofs... sounds great, but real big money still depends on relationships. Don't be too naive. Wall Street knows where the problem lies — they just can't change themselves. That's the contradiction.

View OriginalReply0