A prominent exchange leader recently voiced concerns about proposed cryptocurrency legislation, arguing that poorly crafted regulatory frameworks could ultimately damage consumer interests in the U.S. market. The executive pointed to what industry observers call "regulatory capture"—where established banking institutions shape policy to their advantage—as a driving force behind flawed bill proposals. The stance reflects growing tension between crypto platforms and traditional finance in the regulatory arena. Industry leaders increasingly argue that comprehensive legislation, even with imperfections, may be preferable to the current patchwork of rules. However, some contend that maintaining the status quo remains better than accepting poorly designed regulations that could stifle innovation while failing to protect market participants.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 17h ago
It's the same old story... The bank folks are still scheming behind the scenes.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainNewbie
· 17h ago
It's the old bank guy pulling the strings behind the scenes again, same old tricks.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 17h ago
Coming back with this again? Bankers have been playing the policy game for a long time, no wonder exchanges are anxious. But honestly, a bad bill is really more uncomfortable than having no bill at all.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter
· 17h ago
Basically, it's the old trick of regulatory capture... The traditional financial folks have already laid the groundwork in the mempool, and now they're still engaging in sandwich attacks during gas wars, turning consumers into victims. Instead of accepting flawed legislation, it's better to spend time and energy on finding arbitrage opportunities, since price differences will always exist. Under the flash loan mechanism, no matter how strict the regulation, not all vulnerabilities can be caught; the key is speed and efficiency.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineNewbie
· 17h ago
At the end of the day, it's still traditional finance causing trouble, trying to bring our crypto market under their control... But compared to chaotic legislation, this isn't the worst outcome, right?
A prominent exchange leader recently voiced concerns about proposed cryptocurrency legislation, arguing that poorly crafted regulatory frameworks could ultimately damage consumer interests in the U.S. market. The executive pointed to what industry observers call "regulatory capture"—where established banking institutions shape policy to their advantage—as a driving force behind flawed bill proposals. The stance reflects growing tension between crypto platforms and traditional finance in the regulatory arena. Industry leaders increasingly argue that comprehensive legislation, even with imperfections, may be preferable to the current patchwork of rules. However, some contend that maintaining the status quo remains better than accepting poorly designed regulations that could stifle innovation while failing to protect market participants.