👀 家人们,每天看行情、刷大佬观点,却从来不开口说两句?你的观点可能比你想的更有价值!
广场新人 & 回归福利正式上线!不管你是第一次发帖还是久违回归,我们都直接送你奖励!🎁
每月 $20,000 奖金等你来领!
📅 活动时间: 长期有效(月底结算)
💎 参与方式:
用户需为首次发帖的新用户或一个月未发帖的回归用户。
发帖时必须带上话题标签: #我在广场发首帖 。
内容不限:币圈新闻、行情分析、晒单吐槽、币种推荐皆可。
💰 奖励机制:
必得奖:发帖体验券
每位有效发帖用户都可获得 $50 仓位体验券。(注:每月奖池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太热情,我们会继续加码!)
进阶奖:发帖双王争霸
月度发帖王: 当月发帖数量最多的用户,额外奖励 50U。
月度互动王: 当月帖子互动量(点赞+评论+转发+分享)最高的用户,额外奖励 50U。
📝 发帖要求:
帖子字数需 大于30字,拒绝纯表情或无意义字符。
内容需积极健康,符合社区规范,严禁广告引流及违规内容。
💡 你的观点可能会启发无数人,你的第一次分享也许就是成为“广场大V”的起点,现在就开始广场创作之旅吧!
SEC Drops Charges: Ripple_s Garlinghouse and Larsen Vindicated in Landmark Case
In a landmark decision, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has cleared Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, and utive Chairman, Chris Larsen, of all ‘baseless’ allegations in a long-standing securities violation case. This development marks a significant victory for Ripple after enduring nearly three years of intense regulatory scrutiny.
The SEC’s decision to dismiss charges signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing dispute between the cryptocurrency industry and the regulatory authority. This legal battle has been closely watched as it sets a precedent in defining what constitutes security in digital assets.
Ripple Triumphs in SEC Legal Battle
The allegations against Garlinghouse and Larsen, initially filed in December 2020, asserted that the digital asset XRP distributions should have been registered as a security. The court’s ruling in July 2023 declared that XRP itself is not a security, a verdict that gave Ripple a significant victory.
The SEC and Ripple have expressed their intention to meet and discuss a potential briefing schedule regarding the pending issue in the case, specifically concerning the appropriate remedies for Ripple’s Section 5 violations related to its Institutional Sales of XRP. Ripple responded to the filing, describing the original pursuit by the SEC as “absurd theatrics” and characterizing this development as a “surrender.”
Brad Garlinghouse has expressed relief after nearly three years of battling baseless allegations. He criticized the SEC for seemingly diverting its attention from criminal activities on offshore exchanges to target individuals and a company working towards building a regulated business within the United States.
Simultaneously, utive Chairman Chris Larsen expressed his sense of vindication, emphasizing the personal toll this lawsuit took on both individuals. He raised pertinent questions about the origin and motivation behind the SEC’s legal pursuit, highlighting what he perceived as an abuse of power.
Ripple’s Impact on the Crypto Industry
Despite this victory, Ripple’s pursuit of sound crypto regulation within the United States is far from over. The company continues to actively dialogue with policymakers and regulators worldwide, aiming to foster responsible innovation within the digital assets industry.
This legal development has implications not only for Ripple but for the broader cryptocurrency industry as well. Under Chair Gary Gensler’s leadership, the SEC has been striving to establish a clear regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. However, this case demonstrates the complexity and challenges in classifying ious digital assets as securities, a matter that is far from settled.
Meanwhile, Katherine Kirkpatrick, the chief legal officer for Cboe Digital, has speculated in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that the SEC may have dismissed the cases against the individual defendants as a legal tactic. She suggested that this move allows them to appeal the Ripple decision much sooner, as opposed to waiting until the conclusion of the trial, which would have been in late spring.