🎄 圣诞季相遇 Gate 广场,共享节日惊喜!
🎉 Gate 广场社区成长值「圣诞抽奖狂欢」第 1️⃣ 5️⃣ 期火热开启!
立即参与 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/pointprize?now_period=15
✨ 如何参与?
1️⃣ 前往 Gate 广场【积分中心】完成日常任务,轻松赚取成长值
2️⃣ 每累计 300 成长值,即可抽奖一次!
🎁 圣诞豪礼等你解锁:
金条 10g、Gate 圣诞限定周边等超值好礼,统统带回家!
📅 12 月 18 日 - 12 月 26 日 24:00 (UTC+8)
🎅 圣诞好运不停,惊喜轮番来袭!
了解更多 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/48766
#BTC #ETH #SOL #GT
Ethereum’s Potential ‘Supreme Court’ Could Secure the Network’s Future
The Ethereum blockchain network has always been a go-to platform for new players to launch their projects and enter the crypto space. In an exciting proposal, Matter Labs co-founder and CEO Alex Gluchowski talks about having an Ethereum court , which will have a similar hierarchical court as in the real world.
In a Twitter post last Saturday, September 2, floated this idea of having an “Ethereum Supreme Court”. He added that this would be similar to the United States Supreme Court, and would be the final stop for parties to dispute the smart contracts issue. Alex Gluchowski stated that this would serve as an intermediary instead of always taking matters to the traditional court or lawyer. Gluchowski stated;
In Gluchowski’s vision, conflicts and urgent updates would be managed through a tiered structure of on-chain courts. The ultimate authority, however, would be an Ethereum layer-1 soft fork, functioning as the “Court of Final Appeal.”
Under this framework, each protocol would maintain its own governance with established procedures for regular and emergency upgrades. Additionally, they would designate a specific contract capable of initiating an appeal process.
Decentralizing Smart Contracts Issue Resolution
Gluchowski also explains how the would work in the case of urgency. In the event of an emergency protocol upgrade, a designated appeal window would be instituted, allowing any user to raise objections to a higher court. However, individuals wishing to contest the upgrade would be required to provide a predetermined bail deposit.
In a hypothetical court hierarchy, protocols such as Aave and Uniswap would engage in disputes through courts like CourtUnchained or JusticeDAO. Following the rulings of these courts, parties would retain the right to escalate their case to the Ethereum Supreme Court.
Nonetheless, Gluchowski acknowledged that for the on-chain court to function effectively, it would necessitate robust social consensus. However, this could be expensive, and thus only “truly extraordinary” cases will be brought before it.
Gluchowski pointed out that while there are already some solutions to address these disputes, they are not entirely effective. For instance, implementing time-locked features in smart contracts may not be suitable for emergency situations. On the other hand, introducing a security council can help mitigate the problem but may not offer a complete solution and comes with its own set of risks.
“A security council could only freeze the contract temporarily, requiring a token governance approval for an emergency upgrade. But now a malicious majority of undercollaterized stakers could perform an evil take-over upgrade and steal all the assets,” he explained.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: