12 月 ETH 价格预测 · 发帖挑战 📈
12 月降息预期升温,ETH 热点回暖,借此窗口期发起行情预测互动!
欢迎 Gate 社区用户 —— 判趋势 · 猜行情 · 赢奖励 💰
奖励 🎁:预测命中的用户中抽取 5 位,每位 10 USDT
时间 📅:预测截止 12 月 11 日 12:00(UTC+8)
参与方式 ✍️:
在 Gate 广场发布 ETH 行情预测帖,写明价格区间(如 $3,200–$3,400,区间需<$200),并添加话题 #ETH12月行情预测
发帖示例 👇
示例①:
#ETH12月行情预测
预测区间:$3,150-$3,250
行情偏震荡上行,若降息如期落地 + ETF 情绪配合,冲击前高可期 🚀
示例②:
#ETH12月行情预测
预测区间:$3,300-$3,480
资金回流 + L2 降费利好中期趋势,向上试探 $3,400 的概率更高 📊
评选规则 📍
以 12 月 11 日 12:00(UTC+8)ETH 实时价格为参考
价格落入预测区间 → 视为命中
若命中人数>5 → 从命中者中随机抽取 5 位 🏆
Dogecoin Trademark Tussle: USPTO Rejects Application, Favoring Decentralization
In the wake of the recent growth and popularity of Dogecoin (Doge), the Dogecoin Foundation filed an application to trademark the “gold circular medallion” that features the letter “D” and the Shiba Inu dog. According to the latest report, this application has been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Per the details, Dogecoin Foundation attempted to register this mark for most of its services.
Multiple reasons have been cited by USPTO for the refusal and this includes “Failure to Function.” According to them, the “applied-for” mark appears as a universal symbol. In this case, it can not in any way function as a trademark or service mark. The USPTO statement further explains that consumers are likely to perceive it as the conveying of information about the service rather than being a unique identifier of the source
Another reason for rejection is the deive nature. USPTO explains that the “applied-for” mark only represents the deion of the applicant’s services. It is important to understand that the application captured the broader aspect of its services ranging from educational conferences in blockchain technology to software development
USPTO also cited “generic for the applicant’s services” as a reason to reject it. In this case, the mark cannot be trademarked even if it achieves widespread recognition as long as it is classified as “generic”.
More Reasons for the Dogecoin Foundation’s Trademark Application Rejection
The issue of “Evidence Of Acquired Distinctiveness” was also cited. Dogecoin Foundation provided evidence which includes a declaration by the president. However, the provided evidence was found to be insufficient. According to the USPTO, a more deive term must be accompanied by substantial evidence.
Another interesting observation is that Dogecoin Foundation used Ethereum in its argument, stating that the stance of USPTO remains questionable with the existence of Ethereum as a registered mark. In response, the Trademark Office stated that Ethereum has a consistent owner from the beginning, unlike Dogecoin
It is worth noting that the Dogecoin Foundation can still respond to the refusal with compelling evidence or a better argument for the registration
Dogecoin currently has a bearish market sentiment and has fallen by 0.6 percent in the last seven days, and 1.8 percent in the last 24 hours to trade at $0.062322
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: