I see that the project team is serious about doing their work, and I don't really pay much attention to their vision statements. I mainly focus on two things: where the treasury funds are being spent and whether the milestones have actually been achieved. Spending money isn't about "spending more = working harder," but about spending in a way that addresses gaps: security audits, infrastructure, developer incentives—things that leave a lasting impact. If most of the funds are going into marketing, recruitment, or various "partnership promotions," I’ll be skeptical from the start. The same goes for milestones—don't just give me a bunch of roadmaps; give me verifiable results: code updates, on-chain data, whether the product is usable, and preferably a retrospective review.



Recently, the kind of economic collapse seen in blockchain games serves as a cautionary tale: inflation kicks in, studios get involved, and when the token price drops, it spirals downward directly. No matter how much the treasury "spends," it can't be saved. Honestly, I care more about the ledger and deliverables than stories and emotions... That's all for now.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin