Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just came across an interesting story that raises many questions in the crypto community. It turns out that at the end of last year, there was a high-level meeting at the White House dedicated to digital asset policy. And supposedly, something noteworthy happened there.
According to U.Today, former SEC Chairman Gary Gensler personally apologized to Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse. If this really happened, it would be a huge turn in the long-standing confrontation between these two parties. Remember, this whole story started back in December 2020, when the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, claiming that XRP was sold as an unregistered security.
But here’s the catch — neither the SEC nor Ripple itself confirmed this incident. Nevertheless, it has already sparked a wave of speculation in financial and legal circles. People are actively discussing what this could mean.
The thing is, the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple became one of the most significant in the history of cryptocurrency regulation in the U.S. The decision issued in July 2023 was ambiguous — the court divided XRP sales into software and institutional sales, creating certain nuances in interpretation. Gary Gensler, as the chief regulator at the time, was at the center of this confrontation.
If the alleged apologies from Gary Gensler did indeed take place, it could signal a rethinking of the regulatory approach. Many see this as an acknowledgment that the case was more complex than it initially appeared, and that its consequences seriously impacted the entire industry. This could open the door to more constructive dialogue between regulators and crypto companies in the future.