Recently, someone has been watching the unlock calendar and shouting about selling pressure again. I happened to flip through a few more DAO proposals... Frankly, what's truly valuable in voting isn't "opinions," but how incentives are distributed and how power is divided. For example, writing the budget as "ecosystem support," but in reality, it's all service fees paid to a few entities for delegation and voting guidance; or changing the staking threshold, which on the surface seems safe but actually locks voting power more securely in the hands of a few. (Looking at proposals feels like searching for Easter eggs.) I now just see it as slowly picking up bargains: first, see who can gain certainty from rule changes; as for short-term emotions... well, they happen every day.