Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
OnlyFans founder is gone, 43 years old, cancer.
Leonid Radvinsky. Most people haven't heard this name.
But he might be one of the most money-making internet entrepreneurs of the past five years. In 2018, he bought a 75% stake in OnlyFans for less than $50 million. By 2024, he was taking home $701 million in dividends alone in a single year.
Forbes estimated his net worth between $4.7 billion to $7.8 billion at the time of his death. He almost never gave interviews, had no public social media, and his own employees rarely saw him. A true behind-the-scenes player.
But what I want to discuss today isn't his life story.
I want to talk about OnlyFans' business model.
The platform essentially does one thing: stands between creators and fans, takes 20%, with creators responsible for content production, fan maintenance, and traffic acquisition, while the platform provides payment channels and infrastructure.
Then it takes one-fifth of every single transaction. In 2023, the platform's total transaction volume exceeded $6.5 billion, with company profits exceeding $1 billion.
Radvinsky personally took home $472 million in dividends.
This structure is clean enough to make people jealous. No inventory. No massive content moderation costs (creators bear them). No copyright disputes.
Doesn't even need a recommendation algorithm. Plainly put, this is a rent-collection machine.
You can think this industry is controversial. But from a business structure perspective, Radvinsky got three things right:
First, he found an industry with extremely poor payment infrastructure (adult content) and solved the core pain point.
Second, he made creators bear almost all operational costs, with the platform only serving as a conduit.
Third, he never stepped forward, never branded himself, letting the platform become synonymous with the category.
He left at 43, leaving behind a machine that makes $1 billion a year.
You can disagree with this industry, but this business model is worth studying for everyone building platforms. What is true platform economics? It's not about how many users you have. It's about how many transactions you stand in the middle of, and how much value you can extract.