Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
BitBoy Ben Armstrong Loses Lawsuit: Court Orders $2.8 Million in Damages
A significant ruling has just been announced by the Southern Florida District Court, holding former crypto influencer Ben Armstrong, famously known as BitBoy, legally liable. This decision stems from a defamation lawsuit filed by well-known investor Kevin O’Leary.
From a post on X to the court ruling
The legal dispute originated in March 2025, when BitBoy Ben Armstrong posted inaccurate information on the X platform. According to the post, Armstrong claimed that O’Leary was involved in a fatal boat accident in 2019 and had committed murder. These claims were later proven to be completely false.
Since Ben Armstrong did not provide any rebuttal or evidence to support his claims, Judge Beth Bloom issued a court ruling on six counts of defamation. This is known as a “default judgment,” meaning the court ruled because BitBoy did not submit any defense.
Details of the awarded damages
The total compensation Ben Armstrong must pay amounts to $2.8 million, divided into several categories:
Underlying reasons for the defamation lawsuit
This case highlights the risks public figures in the crypto space face when using social media platforms. False or harmful statements can lead to serious legal consequences. The case of BitBoy Ben Armstrong serves as a warning to industry influencers that legal responsibility is real and can incur significant financial costs.
This ruling also emphasizes the importance of accuracy and accountability when disseminating information, especially in the crypto context where news can spread rapidly and have substantial impacts.