Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
CLARITY Act Stalls: Crypto Regulation Faces Banking vs. Industry Stalemate
The cryptocurrency market awaits clarity on regulatory direction as the U.S. Senate delays the CLARITY Act—a landmark bill designed to establish comprehensive crypto regulation frameworks. The postponement stems from fundamental disagreements between the banking sector and digital asset companies on how stringent crypto regulation should be, particularly regarding profit-sharing mechanisms and institutional oversight.
The Core Dispute: Stablecoin Interest Earning Rights
At the heart of the conflict lies a seemingly technical but strategically significant question: should stablecoin holders be permitted to earn interest on their holdings? Traditional banks are pushing for tight restrictions on such returns, viewing them as competitive threats to conventional savings products. Conversely, the crypto industry argues that interest-bearing stablecoins are essential financial innovations that should operate with minimal constraints. This single issue has become a defining friction point in broader crypto regulation discussions, blocking legislative progress on the CLARITY Act.
Beyond Stablecoins: Regulatory Tensions Expand
The postponement reveals that stablecoins represent only one layer of contention. Additional regulatory flashpoints include how exchange platforms should be incentivized or restricted, what legal responsibilities should fall on decentralized finance developers, and how much enforcement authority regulators ultimately need. Banks advocate for expansive regulatory power and developer liability, while crypto advocates counter that such measures would stifle innovation and push development offshore. These competing visions for crypto regulation remain fundamentally misaligned.
What’s at Stake in Crypto Regulation
The CLARITY Act delay underscores a broader challenge: finding common ground between traditional finance and digital asset sectors. How policymakers ultimately balance these interests will determine the framework for crypto regulation in the coming years, affecting everything from institutional adoption to startup viability. The industry watches closely as Senate negotiations continue, knowing that the outcomes will reshape the competitive landscape between traditional banking and decentralized finance solutions.