On February 12, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a $4 million fine against peer-to-peer encryption platform Paxful. The company previously admitted that, lacking anti-money laundering and customer due diligence mechanisms, it had long transferred funds for criminals and profited directly from these activities. The related funds are alleged to be connected to human trafficking, scams, extortion, and illegal prostitution activities.
Prosecutors disclosed that between January 2017 and September 2019, Paxful facilitated over 26 million transactions totaling nearly $3 billion, earning approximately $29.7 million in revenue. The Department of Justice pointed out that the company had promoted its platform as “no identity verification required” and published anti-money laundering policies that were not actually implemented, thereby attracting high-risk customers.
Investigations revealed that Paxful had partnerships with the seized illegal classified ad website Backpage and similar platforms. The U.S. Department of Justice stated that its founder privately boasted that the “Backpage effect” drove platform growth. Between 2015 and 2022 alone, such collaborations generated about $2.7 million in profit for the platform.
Initially, prosecutors believed a fine of $112.5 million was appropriate, but considering the company’s cessation of operations and inability to pay, the final penalty was set at $4 million. Paxful shut down at the end of 2025. The company attributed its collapse in a statement to misconduct by former management and high compliance remediation costs.
Former co-founder Ray Youssef responded that the platform had fallen into an irreversible crisis before his departure. Another co-founder and former CTO, Artur Schaback, admitted in 2024 to conspiracy for failing to maintain an anti-money laundering system and is currently awaiting sentencing.
This case is seen as another landmark event in the U.S. strengthening enforcement of crypto compliance, sending a clear signal to the industry: platforms that ignore anti-money laundering obligations will face dual pressure from criminal and regulatory authorities.
Related Articles
Caixin: Document No. 42 sets the tone for "strict regulation of overseas RWA," China International Capital Corporation Hong Kong has already explored cooperation with public chains and exchanges
"CLARITY Act" Negotiations: White House Supports "Conditional Interest for Stablecoins," Banking Industry's Compromise Nears
Custodia CEO Says Trump Family Crypto Ties Are Part of Clarity Act Problem