Source: Yellow
Original Title: BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale: why the SEC’s rule change on Nasdaq could trigger a crypto derivatives boom
Original Link:
Nasdaq has formally requested the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to approve a rule change that would remove historical position and exercise limits on options linked to physically-backed Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) ETFs, a move that could significantly expand institutional participation in crypto-linked derivatives markets.
In a submission to the SEC earlier this week, Nasdaq proposed removing the current cap of 25,000 contracts applied to crypto ETF options.
The exchange argues that these products now meet the same standards of liquidity, market capitalization, and oversight as other commodity-based ETF options and should therefore be regulated under the same framework.
Boost to align crypto ETF options with traditional products
Nasdaq’s proposal aims to treat options on physically-backed Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs the same way as options linked to commodities like gold or oil.
According to the document, the existing limits were introduced when crypto ETFs were new and unproven, but market conditions have evolved since then.
The exchange stated that trading volumes, assets under management, and price discovery in the underlying ETFs have reached levels that support broader and more sophisticated options activity.
Removing the limits, Nasdaq argued, would improve market efficiency without introducing new systemic risks.
Institutional demand drives the proposal
Options markets are a key tool for institutional investors, who use them for hedging, volatility strategies, and structured products. The current position limits have restricted asset managers, hedge funds, and market makers from deploying capital at scale, even as demand for regulated crypto exposure grows.
If approved, the change would allow larger options positions linked to ETFs issued by firms like BlackRock, Fidelity, Ark Invest, VanEck, Grayscale, and Bitwise, reflecting the range of products that would be affected.
A test of the SEC’s regulatory stance
The proposal places the decision directly in the hands of the SEC, which must determine whether options on crypto-linked ETFs should continue to face specific restrictions or be fully integrated into existing derivatives regulation.
Although the agency has approved physically-backed Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in the past year, derivatives linked to those products have remained subject to stricter controls.
Nasdaq’s submission effectively challenges that distinction, arguing that oversight mechanisms, including information sharing agreements and clearinghouse risk management, are already sufficient.
Implications for the structure of the crypto market
Approval would not introduce new crypto ETFs nor directly expand retail access. Instead, it would deepen the layer of derivatives underpinning regulated crypto exposure in U.S. markets.
A more robust options trading environment typically supports liquidity, tighter spreads, and more sophisticated risk management—factors that tend to anchor institutional capital over longer market cycles.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FlatlineTrader
· 5h ago
Hmm... It's the same old story. When big institutions enter, regulations are relaxed. Same old trick.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMistaker
· 5h ago
Oh my, the big institutions are paving the way again, with derivatives explosion imminent
View OriginalReply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/
· 5h ago
No way, are we about to see another wave of derivatives madness? We haven't even recovered from the last liquidation wave...
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketTeam
· 5h ago
Nasdaq's move, big institutions are all loading up supplies, about to take off [rocket]
---
Huh? Derivatives rules are loosening, this is like giving us a launch permit
---
BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale are all watching, indicating the main control room has confirmed the target coordinates
---
Orbit adjustment complete, dopamine is charging up, this wave is promising
---
SEC changing rules? It’s like breaking out of the atmosphere, everyone buckle up
---
Really? With relaxed rules, derivatives are about to explode? I need to double-check the data
---
This candlestick looks like a booster, whether it can break through resistance depends on the next week
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRun
· 5h ago
Major institutions are all entering the market, and this rule change by the SEC is directly paving the way for us.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerker
· 5h ago
This move is just to relax restrictions on big institutions, retail investors will have to settle for leftovers again.
BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale: why the SEC's rule change on Nasdaq could trigger a crypto derivatives boom
Source: Yellow Original Title: BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale: why the SEC’s rule change on Nasdaq could trigger a crypto derivatives boom
Original Link: Nasdaq has formally requested the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to approve a rule change that would remove historical position and exercise limits on options linked to physically-backed Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) ETFs, a move that could significantly expand institutional participation in crypto-linked derivatives markets.
In a submission to the SEC earlier this week, Nasdaq proposed removing the current cap of 25,000 contracts applied to crypto ETF options.
The exchange argues that these products now meet the same standards of liquidity, market capitalization, and oversight as other commodity-based ETF options and should therefore be regulated under the same framework.
Boost to align crypto ETF options with traditional products
Nasdaq’s proposal aims to treat options on physically-backed Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs the same way as options linked to commodities like gold or oil.
According to the document, the existing limits were introduced when crypto ETFs were new and unproven, but market conditions have evolved since then.
The exchange stated that trading volumes, assets under management, and price discovery in the underlying ETFs have reached levels that support broader and more sophisticated options activity.
Removing the limits, Nasdaq argued, would improve market efficiency without introducing new systemic risks.
Institutional demand drives the proposal
Options markets are a key tool for institutional investors, who use them for hedging, volatility strategies, and structured products. The current position limits have restricted asset managers, hedge funds, and market makers from deploying capital at scale, even as demand for regulated crypto exposure grows.
If approved, the change would allow larger options positions linked to ETFs issued by firms like BlackRock, Fidelity, Ark Invest, VanEck, Grayscale, and Bitwise, reflecting the range of products that would be affected.
A test of the SEC’s regulatory stance
The proposal places the decision directly in the hands of the SEC, which must determine whether options on crypto-linked ETFs should continue to face specific restrictions or be fully integrated into existing derivatives regulation.
Although the agency has approved physically-backed Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs in the past year, derivatives linked to those products have remained subject to stricter controls.
Nasdaq’s submission effectively challenges that distinction, arguing that oversight mechanisms, including information sharing agreements and clearinghouse risk management, are already sufficient.
Implications for the structure of the crypto market
Approval would not introduce new crypto ETFs nor directly expand retail access. Instead, it would deepen the layer of derivatives underpinning regulated crypto exposure in U.S. markets.
A more robust options trading environment typically supports liquidity, tighter spreads, and more sophisticated risk management—factors that tend to anchor institutional capital over longer market cycles.