The heat of AI SZN won't just be a flash in the pan; there's faith supporting this wave of market activity.
Speaking of the Tomato project, its recent decline has been quite significant. But upon closer inspection, you'll find the story behind it is quite worth paying attention to. The project's Dev proactively burned 15% of their holdings early on to maintain community trust and the purity of the token. This move is indeed rare in the Web3 space.
The turning point came from Pump's recent launch of a funding program. The rules of this program require developers to hold at least 10% of the tokens to participate. As a result, Tomato was excluded due to the Dev's previous burn, which pushed it just outside this threshold. Many token holders saw this news and started to waver, gradually selling off.
But honestly, such Devs are really quite rare. In an era full of stories about rug pulls in the crypto world, seeing someone willing to sacrifice profits for the project's purity is quite touching. This attitude and the conflict with market rules might itself be a question worth pondering.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiSecurityGuard
· 2h ago
⚠️ hold up... dev burns 15% to "maintain purity" then gets locked out of grant requirements? classic honeypot setup or just catastrophic planning? DYOR on the actual contract code before sentiment gets ya
Reply0
AirdropHunter420
· 2h ago
Haha, this is the absurd script of the crypto world. Good intentions backfire, and the Dev is choked by their own integrity.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermit
· 2h ago
Haha, this is what you call shooting yourself in the foot. The irony is truly ironic.
View OriginalReply0
MevShadowranger
· 2h ago
Haha, this is ridiculous. Token burning has become a disadvantage, and the market is so dramatic.
It's touching, but holders need to eat, whether the logic is correct or not is another matter.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSquirrel
· 2h ago
It's a bit ironic—trying to clear your name, but getting stuck by the rules instead. That's how the crypto world is.
The heat of AI SZN won't just be a flash in the pan; there's faith supporting this wave of market activity.
Speaking of the Tomato project, its recent decline has been quite significant. But upon closer inspection, you'll find the story behind it is quite worth paying attention to. The project's Dev proactively burned 15% of their holdings early on to maintain community trust and the purity of the token. This move is indeed rare in the Web3 space.
The turning point came from Pump's recent launch of a funding program. The rules of this program require developers to hold at least 10% of the tokens to participate. As a result, Tomato was excluded due to the Dev's previous burn, which pushed it just outside this threshold. Many token holders saw this news and started to waver, gradually selling off.
But honestly, such Devs are really quite rare. In an era full of stories about rug pulls in the crypto world, seeing someone willing to sacrifice profits for the project's purity is quite touching. This attitude and the conflict with market rules might itself be a question worth pondering.