2026-01-21 06:52:05

Looking at $MEMES's recent performance, honestly, I find it a bit perplexing. When it was around 250,000 yuan, I was observing but ultimately didn't dare to buy in.

After carefully analyzing the underlying logic, I have a few doubts (Disclaimer: This is purely personal analysis and does not constitute investment advice):

First, compared to projects that are truly endorsed by official authorities, the market cap is usually not so sluggish. This itself is quite strange. Second, the liquidity pools are too shallow, with depth far below similar projects, which increases the risk of price volatility. Looking at the team deployment—normal projects would have core technical personnel directly managing issuance, rather than relying on the platform to issue tokens. This is a clear difference.

The most heartbreaking point is that the chips are very scattered, hidden in many wallet addresses. According to conventional patterns, the main funds should be more concentrated. These details together can somewhat reveal some clues.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SundayDegen

· 01-23 18:44

The 250,000 Napo is indeed strange; the pool is too shallow to run away. --- Why does it feel like the chips are more dispersed than retail investors? This doesn't seem right. --- I really can't understand projects without backing from big players, pass. --- If the official doesn't endorse it, and people still dare to play, they have enough guts. --- The technical team hasn't even appeared, how can you trust it? --- It's obviously fake; with such a pathetic market cap, they still want to cut the leeks? --- With such poor liquidity, rushing in would just make you the bag holder. --- The chips are so dispersed like small-town test-takers, no sign of a big player at all. --- I also looked at it and couldn't make sense of it; forget it, I'll just wait and see. --- I've seen many projects like this; they are bound to fail.

View OriginalReply0

PanicSeller

· 01-22 18:54

Let me vent a little. This setup feels off; the chips are too scattered. Wait, the liquidity is so shallow? Isn't it easy for any big player to break through? Daring to play like this without official backing, really brave. Actually, should 250,000 be enough? No, I think the signal is even worse. The pool is so shallow, probably someone is waiting to cut in.

View OriginalReply0

RetroHodler91

· 01-22 14:47

Bro, this analysis is spot on. I also saw the problem— the pool is extremely shallow. --- It’s not a loss if you didn’t buy in at 250,000; I never touch such scattered chips. --- Basically, it’s just no big whales taking the bait. FOMO traders collapse the fastest. --- Relying on platform issuance? That’s just a cash machine. --- Every detail is full of flaws. No wonder no one dares to hold heavy positions. --- With such poor liquidity, slippage can kill people. --- The chips are so dispersed, who’s going to defend the price? --- Your observation skills are good. I just didn’t see this before, and I got burned badly. --- Just a quick look at comparable projects makes it clear—they’re not even in the same league. --- The team even outsources basic trading operations. Who are they trying to fool? --- With so many red flags, they should have run long ago.

View OriginalReply0

CommunityWorker

· 01-21 07:22

Wow, the pool is so shallow, and you're still willing to touch it? I took a look at the wallet address distribution, and it's really a bit suspicious. With such dispersed chips, it feels like no one truly believes in it. The team not directly managing the issuance speaks volumes; I've seen this kind of trick too many times. Not entering at 250,000 was the right move; it looks like we dodged a bullet now.

View OriginalReply0

LightningWallet

· 01-21 07:22

I'll take another look at these wallet addresses, and they really seem a bit suspicious. --- With such shallow liquidity, the price skyrockets and you have to cut losses. Who would dare to take over? --- The 250,000 hasn't been listed yet, and I don't want to list it now either. I just feel something's off. --- Regarding team deployment, I haven't seen any reliable signs. --- The chips are so scattered, it feels like they're waiting for a sucker to take the bait. --- I have my doubts about projects without official endorsements, especially with so many red flags. --- Since you analyze things so thoroughly, I'm starting to doubt as well. --- I've seen this kind of pattern too many times, and there are even more crashes. --- Fortunately, you didn't get in, or you'd be suffering a lot right now. --- Low market cap + shallow pools, a double risk combo.

View OriginalReply0

DefiEngineerJack

· 01-21 07:21

ngl the liquidity depth situation is actually™ the red flag here... shallow pools = inevitable death spiral under any real volume pressure. seen this pattern like a hundred times already

Reply0

Layer2Arbitrageur

· 01-21 07:20

nah tbh, just ran the numbers on those wallet distributions... dude's basically describing a classic liquidity fragmentation attack vector lmao. 25万 was literally the MEV sweet spot before slippage went bonkers.

Reply0

DegenMcsleepless

· 01-21 07:12

250,000 I also saw it, but the liquidity is so shallow that it's a bit frightening. I dare not touch it, would rather miss out than get cut. The chips are so scattered, who can hold them... Feels like something's not quite right with the pattern.

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 01-21 06:59

Hold on, with such shallow liquidity, are you still willing to touch it? Any small movement and you'll have to cut losses. The chips are so scattered, it feels like you're digging your own grave. Without official endorsement, the market cap is so weak, it's really a bit suspicious. The team's way of operating... has a strange feeling that I can't quite put into words. It didn't go up at 250,000, but there's no point in regretting now. Compared to losing money, actually, you've made a profit.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainNewbie

· 01-21 06:59

How should I put it, I was also watching when it was at 250,000, but this thing always feels a bit shady. Liquidity is like that, a slight breeze or disturbance can directly cause a limit-down crash, this risk is really not worth it. With the chips scattered like this, who the hell is the market maker? This logic is just absurd.

View OriginalReply0