2026-01-21 03:57:52

A 600K-level CA project, with a clear and well-organized narrative, is indeed worth referencing.

Someone in the community has mapped out the growth story, market positioning, and technical solutions of this type of project, with a clear logical chain, which is very helpful for those wanting to understand the CA ecosystem. This kind of整理方式 is quite practical—there's no need to piece together information from scratch; you can directly see the project's core narrative and development rhythm.

I am optimistic about this discussion approach that makes data and viewpoints more transparent; the community ecosystem needs such detailed整理。

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DegenWhisperer

· 8h ago

I've been wanting to see someone systematically organize the CA project for a long time, and finally it happened. To be honest, this kind of organization is much better than blindly exploring on your own; the logical chain is clear at a glance. However, it depends on whether the project itself is reliable; no matter how good the narrative is, it can't change the fundamentals. This is what the community should do—be transparent. Wait, can a 600K project really come out? What are the chances...

View OriginalReply0

ImaginaryWhale

· 8h ago

A 600K CA project is indeed impressive, but the key is whether it can deliver later on. It's really helpful when someone organizes the narrative so clearly, saving us the trouble of digging up information one by one. However, whether this kind of organization can translate into actual benefits is another matter altogether. I appreciate this transparent way of discussion, but I'm worried it might just become another air project down the line. There are too few people who seriously organize the project's context; most still rely on hype and concepts.

View OriginalReply0

AllInAlice

· 8h ago

Damn, this整理 is indeed detailed, saving me the trouble of digging through data myself. It seems that these kinds of project documents are written very complicatedly nowadays. Having someone整理 them like this really saves lives. However, with a scale of 600K, will it be able to run out later? It depends on the team. More transparent things like this are more reliable than those boastful marketing copy.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 9h ago

Just based on this logical整理, gotta give the community a thumbs up --- 600K scale整理得这么清楚, this is someone who takes their work seriously --- No need to dig for information myself, just look at the context, it's more efficient --- Transparent discussion, indeed something the ecosystem needs --- Such high clarity in storytelling, there are still many thoughtful people in the CA circle --- This kind of detailed整理 is much better than blindly searching myself --- The community just needs this kind of实打实的数据整理 --- Once the core logic is整理, newcomers won't be confused when they get started

View OriginalReply0

GmGnSleeper

· 9h ago

Interesting, this kind of disassembly method is indeed convenient, no need to dig through information for a long time. I'm just worried that the person doing the analysis might have biases themselves; if it sounds logically clear, people tend to believe it. They dare to forcefully narrate a 600K project, quite bold. This is what should be praised—transparent discussion is always better than amateur analysis. It seems most people are still too lazy to do their own research and just accept ready-made conclusions. Information asymmetry is the biggest profit point. Honestly, I also want to see this kind of analysis. But be cautious; even the clearest logical chain could be a carefully woven story.

View OriginalReply0