The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has recently announced the launch of the "Future Proof" regulatory initiative, aiming to systematically review the existing regulatory framework. This move reflects a reality — traditional regulations tailored for the futures market are clearly struggling to keep up with the emerging digital assets and innovative trading models.



CFTC Chairman Mike Selig emphasized in public that the agency will adhere to the principle of "minimum effective regulatory intensity." This may sound like a relaxation of restrictions, but it actually reveals a deeper shift in regulatory thinking — rather than rigidly applying outdated frameworks, it is better to reassess what kinds of rules can both protect market participants and preserve the innovative vitality of emerging markets.

The diversity of digital asset trading scenarios indeed presents challenges for regulation. Whether it is spot trading of crypto assets, derivatives markets, or the emergence of various new exchanges, all are testing the boundaries of the current regulatory system. This comprehensive review, to some extent, is the CFTC acknowledging that a one-size-fits-all regulatory approach can no longer keep pace with market developments.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockBargainHuntervip
· 5h ago
Finally, someone dares to take a slice of this cake. Is relaxing regulations really something we've been waiting so long for?
View OriginalReply0
RadioShackKnightvip
· 5h ago
Haha, really? Finally, someone is thinking about crypto here. The old framework definitely needs to be discarded.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 5h ago
Uh, finally someone sees it clearly. The old framework should have been discarded long ago.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHuntressvip
· 5h ago
After research and analysis, I see through the logic behind this move—CFTC is just being left behind a few blocks by the market progress, which is why they had to loosen up. What's really interesting is the so-called "minimum effective regulatory intensity," which sounds good but actually admits that the old framework is dead and it's better to go with the flow. Data shows that such regulatory shifts are often accompanied by positive releases; the key is to look at the subsequent implementation details and not just be fooled by press releases.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)