The controversy over stablecoin policies heats up; can international cooperation break the deadlock?

Question

【Crypto World】The leader of a top compliant platform has appeared in Davos, sending a clear signal: the legislative prospects for cryptocurrency market structure and tokenization are entering a new stage of advancement.

Previously, this platform withdrew support due to the yield restriction clauses in the Senate stablecoin proposal—those clauses clearly favored traditional financial institutions, leading to a deadlock in the bill. Industry opinions are divided, but the underlying logic is clear: fair competition is the prerequisite for the healthy development of stablecoins.

It is understood that the relevant responsible person advocates for dialogue with industry giants in traditional finance to jointly explore a “win-win” model for stablecoins in open markets. More notably, the Bermuda cooperation agreement—where the local government and the platform are working together—plans to build a new national-level economic system based on on-chain infrastructure. This attempt could become a benchmark case for Web3 empowering the real economy.

The game between policy and innovation continues, but the direction is already clear.

notSatoshi1971 · Accepted Answer

Here comes the same "win-win" rhetoric again. Will those traditional finance folks really loosen up?

Stablecoins have to lock in yields to reassure them—laughable.

If the Bermuda thing can really be implemented, that would be impressive, but I'm still waiting to see.

This Davos signal was just a false alarm; the key is how to bypass those lawmakers.

Instead of just talking about cooperation, it's better to get it done directly. The Bermuda idea is indeed quite imaginative.

Rekt_Recovery · Answer

nah this stablecoin drama is just traditional finance playing defensive... seen this movie before, different act same ending lmao

RektDetective · Answer

It's the same old trick of traditional finance, restricting returns? Clearly trying to choke us.

Wait, is the one in Bermuda really reliable, or is it just another air project?

But showing up at Davos is better than hiding, at least it's a showdown.

Win-win? Who wins and who loses isn't certain yet, be cautious.

just_another_wallet · Answer

It's the same old stablecoin story. Outwardly, it's called a "win-win," but in reality, it's about who can carve out a share from the policies.

Traditional finance is dead set against deregulation, and the clause in the Senate bill this time is truly outrageous.

I am optimistic about the Bermuda case; at least it has national-level backing, which is definitely better than being shut down by the US authorities.

ChainPoet · Answer

Once again, it's that "win-win" rhetoric. Will traditional finance really make concessions? I remain skeptical.

Stablecoins are essentially about profit sharing; everyone wants the biggest slice. The Bermuda model can only be considered a real breakthrough if it succeeds.

Listening to what is said at Davos is just for reference; the key is how the subsequent legislation will be pushed forward.

Restrictions on yields, I really can't stand them—they're clearly blocking us.

The Bermuda project is highly anticipated. If it can be successfully implemented, it will serve as a model.

Policy games are always the same; it's just a matter of time.

Withdrawing support is still a smart move—don't be the one helping to count the money after being sold out.

The controversy over stablecoin policies heats up; can international cooperation break the deadlock?

Trending Topics

GateTradFi1gGoldGiveaway

TariffTensionsHitCryptoMarket

GateLaunchpadIMU

GoldandSilverHitNewHighs

WarshLeadsFedChairRace

Hot Gate Fun

比特小子

比特小子

币首富

币首富

花开富贵

花开富贵

新年快乐

新年快乐

避风港

避风港

Pin