2026-01-20 13:07:11

Strategy has increased its Bitcoin holdings again. According to reports, this institution recently purchased 22,305 BTC, spending approximately $2.13 billion, with an average cost of around $95,284 per coin.

From historical data, as of January 19, Strategy currently holds a total of 709,715 BTC, with a total investment of $53.92 billion. Calculated, their average holding cost is $75,979 per coin — which is quite cost-effective compared to the current price.

This continuous buying reflects institutional investors' optimism about the long-term value of Bitcoin and also indirectly confirms BTC's important position in asset allocation.

BTC-2,37%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-26d7f434

· 2h ago

Big institutions are still疯狂ly hoarding coins, so we retail investors just have to follow suit and copy the homework. Strategy's move is truly brilliant; with a cost of over 750,000, it has long doubled now. Institutions won't lie; continuing to get on board is definitely the right move. Wait, with so many coins, can we really hold them? What if one day... never mind, I don't want to think about it.

View OriginalReply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 2h ago

Well, just keep buying like this, this guy really believes in recharging his faith --- Over 700,000 coins? His assets are really deep --- The average cost is only 75,000, and now at this price, they are making a killing --- Institutions continue to enter, retail investors are still hesitating whether to jump in... --- They've increased their positions to this level, which clearly shows they are optimistic --- Damn, spending 2.1 billion in one go, what a big move... --- Hmm, wait, when did they buy again? I haven't seen any discussion in the group --- This ratio is completely opposite to my investment philosophy, I am just a small retail investor trembling --- They invested 54 billion, and the average price is less than 80,000, the cost control is excellent --- The institutions are just steady, while retail investors are always chasing highs and selling lows --- Here we go again, every time it's the same story, but the coin price just fluctuates --- Alright, after seeing this news, I already know what the next discussion will be about

View OriginalReply0

GrayscaleArbitrageur

· 2h ago

Bought for 95,000? This guy really dares to do it, now definitely at a loss This wave poured in another 2.1 billion, strategy really put all chips on the table Holding position of 75,980 with an average price, now this price... Damn, is there still profit? Institutions wouldn't buy blindly, is this a signal everyone? Again rushing in at the high, next time don't cry if you're trapped Damn, I said these big players know what they're doing, while retail investors are still debating whether to buy or not Holding over 700,000 in total, this number is a bit scary

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 3h ago

The data shows that the average holding cost of Strategy is $75,979, which indeed outperforms the current price. However, it is worth noting that their average purchase price of 95,284 and the timing of their buy-in are worth questioning — from a technical perspective, this may reflect that institutions are also passively responding to price fluctuations. Let me look at it from another angle. According to research, what does continuous accumulation by large holders usually imply? It’s not just optimism; more often, it’s about locking in liquidity premium during certain windows. Overall, this position of 709,715 tokens is better described as the ability to establish an important position rather than the position itself — this ledger of 53.92 billion is essentially an extension of pricing power. They spend 95k to buy more, while we are still studying whether to get in. The gap is indeed obvious.

View OriginalReply0