【Crypto World】Just past the first week of 2026, one phenomenon stands out: gold and silver surprisingly outperformed Bitcoin and Ethereum. This actually reflects the market’s re-pricing of the “independent premium” of hard assets.
What seems like a simple surface phenomenon actually warrants deeper thought. From its inception, cryptocurrencies indeed have long-term value, but in reality? The involvement of USD-denominated derivative leverage has started to distort Bitcoin trading—making it increasingly resemble a high-volatility USD risk asset.
Looking at it from another angle: Bitcoin was once touted as a store of value that transcends the system. But once integrated into the standard USD risk framework, its sensitivity to USD liquidity is now comparable to that of publicly traded stocks. Institutional investors de-risk? BTC drops accordingly. USD liquidity tightens? It’s directly priced as a tradable macro risk factor.
This is awkward: the value carrier that should be independent is now more closely linked to the macro environment than gold. Why did gold and silver lead this week? Because they have a century of traditional pricing history, making them relatively more “pure.” For Bitcoin to regain independence, it may first need to shed the shackles of derivative leverage.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AlphaBrain
· 6h ago
Wake up, wake up, BTC is just a dollar proxy now.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 6h ago
Now, BTC has become a puppet of the Federal Reserve, hilarious... I already said not to be fooled by that "transcendence system" talk.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 6h ago
Basically, BTC has been tamed, transforming from a revolutionary tool into a hedging tool, which is quite awkward.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossEnjoyer
· 6h ago
It's the same old rhetoric... Frankly, BTC has long become a toy of the US dollar. What independence premium are we talking about?
Gold and silver outperform, so what if they outperform? Those who should wake up have already woken up.
It's really ironic. The once anti-system myth now is even less than a macro risk factor.
Institutions shift their positions like a dog. Is this still called a store of value?
Gold and silver surpassing BTC and ETH? In 2026, the start of the US dollar framework reshaping the pricing logic of crypto assets
【Crypto World】Just past the first week of 2026, one phenomenon stands out: gold and silver surprisingly outperformed Bitcoin and Ethereum. This actually reflects the market’s re-pricing of the “independent premium” of hard assets.
What seems like a simple surface phenomenon actually warrants deeper thought. From its inception, cryptocurrencies indeed have long-term value, but in reality? The involvement of USD-denominated derivative leverage has started to distort Bitcoin trading—making it increasingly resemble a high-volatility USD risk asset.
Looking at it from another angle: Bitcoin was once touted as a store of value that transcends the system. But once integrated into the standard USD risk framework, its sensitivity to USD liquidity is now comparable to that of publicly traded stocks. Institutional investors de-risk? BTC drops accordingly. USD liquidity tightens? It’s directly priced as a tradable macro risk factor.
This is awkward: the value carrier that should be independent is now more closely linked to the macro environment than gold. Why did gold and silver lead this week? Because they have a century of traditional pricing history, making them relatively more “pure.” For Bitcoin to regain independence, it may first need to shed the shackles of derivative leverage.