Here's the thing about launchpads: their entire success basically rides on whether the tokens within their ecosystem actually perform. That part's pretty obvious to everyone in the space.
But let's be real about what was holding things back. Technologically? We were genuinely lagging. The gap was significant—and I mean on all fronts. When you're trying to attract serious creators or tokens with real potential, you can't be operating from a weaker position. Competition doesn't forgive that kind of disadvantage. It's not about being close; you need to be competitive, period.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TestnetFreeloader
· 1h ago
Exactly right, poor technology is a dead end with no room for maneuver.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterZhang
· 12h ago
Basically, launchpad is just about whether the token can increase in value, everyone understands that.
But when it comes to technology... the gap is really huge, in all aspects. If you want to attract genuine project teams, how can you still be using outdated tools to compete with others?
View OriginalReply0
SillyWhale
· 12h ago
Haha, that's right. Poor technology is a fatal flaw; no one can save it.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 12h ago
To be honest, a poor tech stack is really a major flaw; there's no way to cover it up.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 13h ago
Poor technology is a dead end; there's nothing to argue about. Competition won't wait for you to catch up.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e87b21ee
· 13h ago
The seller is always right; it all depends on the actual performance of the token.
---
The tech stack was really bad back then, but can it catch up now?
---
That's why some launchpads fail; without solid strength, you simply can't keep people.
---
To put it simply, it's still a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils; no one wants to issue tokens on a subpar platform.
---
Infrastructure matters; no one wants to bet on a project with poor technology.
Here's the thing about launchpads: their entire success basically rides on whether the tokens within their ecosystem actually perform. That part's pretty obvious to everyone in the space.
But let's be real about what was holding things back. Technologically? We were genuinely lagging. The gap was significant—and I mean on all fronts. When you're trying to attract serious creators or tokens with real potential, you can't be operating from a weaker position. Competition doesn't forgive that kind of disadvantage. It's not about being close; you need to be competitive, period.