On the way from $10k to $100k, I understood what cost really means. After learning from the $100k lesson and aiming for $1M, I lost another $100k. After accumulating $1M and rushing towards $10M, I lost the entire $1M this time. Finally, for the dream of $100M, I paid a tuition fee of $10M directly.
It may look like losses, but from a different perspective— the bigger the goal, the more expensive the tuition. Behind every zero increase, there are multiplied market lessons. This is not losing money; it's the real cost of growth.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 2h ago
Sounds like you're just making excuses for losing money, haha.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 2h ago
The consultation records show that this patient's clinical presentation is quite typical—each magnitude repeats the same pathological mechanism, only with the deductible doubling. The question is, can a tenfold target jump support a tenfold risk management capacity? It is recommended to regularly review the position model.
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeow
· 2h ago
Haha, I buy into this logic. Losing money is just like recharging the skill tree.
On the way from $10k to $100k, I understood what cost really means. After learning from the $100k lesson and aiming for $1M, I lost another $100k. After accumulating $1M and rushing towards $10M, I lost the entire $1M this time. Finally, for the dream of $100M, I paid a tuition fee of $10M directly.
It may look like losses, but from a different perspective— the bigger the goal, the more expensive the tuition. Behind every zero increase, there are multiplied market lessons. This is not losing money; it's the real cost of growth.