There's a question that has been puzzling me: what exactly is money worth?
According to Elon Musk's understanding, "money" is essentially a measure of labor. What does having money mean? It means you can command others' labor to work for you. From this perspective, money itself has no intrinsic value; it is merely a certificate of exchange rights.
But there's a problem with this logic—what if artificial intelligence and robotics truly become powerful enough to meet the needs of all humanity? Then everything changes.
Imagine this scenario: productivity expands infinitely, resources are abundant to the point of surplus, and labor becomes an infinitely available commodity. In such a case, does traditional "money" still have a need to exist?
To illustrate this idea, Musk even referenced the worldview of science fiction writer Ian Banks' "Culture" series—in that highly advanced fictional future, scarcity disappears, and the economic system collapses as a result.
This is not just a utopian fantasy. When production efficiency reaches its limit and humans no longer need to exchange or distribute, the foundation of monetary value will collapse. This could be the ultimate question for human civilization's evolution after the Web3 era.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MentalWealthHarvester
· 12h ago
Money is power. Without money, you can't command anything... If AI really does everything, then we might have to redefine what it means to be wealthy.
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapist
· 12h ago
Oops, Elon Musk is once again promoting the post-scarcity era, but I think this guy overlooked one point—power is always more valuable than money.
Even if resources are abundant, can things like influence and decision-making rights be infinitely replicated? Can they?
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebel
· 12h ago
This logical loophole is quite significant. No matter how powerful the robot is, it's still controlled by humans. The power dynamics will always exist, and money just changes its name to continue harvesting profits.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfit
· 12h ago
Oh my god, if this idea can really be produced infinitely, who would still care about money?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxiety
· 12h ago
This logic sounds great, but it still feels too idealistic. Human nature can never really be changed, after all.
There's a question that has been puzzling me: what exactly is money worth?
According to Elon Musk's understanding, "money" is essentially a measure of labor. What does having money mean? It means you can command others' labor to work for you. From this perspective, money itself has no intrinsic value; it is merely a certificate of exchange rights.
But there's a problem with this logic—what if artificial intelligence and robotics truly become powerful enough to meet the needs of all humanity? Then everything changes.
Imagine this scenario: productivity expands infinitely, resources are abundant to the point of surplus, and labor becomes an infinitely available commodity. In such a case, does traditional "money" still have a need to exist?
To illustrate this idea, Musk even referenced the worldview of science fiction writer Ian Banks' "Culture" series—in that highly advanced fictional future, scarcity disappears, and the economic system collapses as a result.
This is not just a utopian fantasy. When production efficiency reaches its limit and humans no longer need to exchange or distribute, the foundation of monetary value will collapse. This could be the ultimate question for human civilization's evolution after the Web3 era.