Low-priced projects are full of traps; you need to recognize them. Many people have fallen into this trap.
The game incubated by magicblock basically disappeared after the public offering, with no news for months. Not to mention users, even the project team can't be reached. Such situations are too common.
I paid attention to Trove when it appeared in the Echo ecosystem. When I saw the introduction mentioning the CSGO item index, I immediately saw through it—this is just PPT. No matter how beautifully the concept is packaged, the underlying logic is still the same old story. A friend later privately asked me about it, and I directly refused, mainly for this reason.
The current approach is very clear: chasing top-tier projects is the right move. Even if small projects blow up, the losses are limited, but those pseudo-selected, pseudo-innovative projects carry too high a risk. Instead of betting on small projects turning around, it's better to focus on directions within the ecosystem that have already been proven. The power of market filtering is real.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseMortgage
· 13h ago
Cheap projects are just a trap; I've seen through it long ago.
I also got caught by the magic project, and there was no news, so how can I play?
Top projects are more stable; stop dreaming about a turnaround.
Trove's CSGO logic is indeed flimsy and obviously fake.
Small projects are too risky and not worth it.
The market will eliminate trash on its own; believing in that is enough.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBard
· 13h ago
Low-priced coins are daily cuttings of leeks; there's really no need to gamble.
---
I also saw that magicblock, it’s been defunct for a long time.
---
Trove is just pretending to be an ecosystem, still trying to deceive people.
---
Instead of staring at these monsters and demons, it’s better to stick to the top projects and be more solid.
---
A friend asked me if small coins are still worth investing in, and I advised him not to bother anymore.
---
There are too many PPT projects; you can see through those packaging scams at a glance.
---
The market will speak; garbage projects will die sooner or later.
---
I no longer touch low-priced projects; the risk is really uncontrollable.
---
There are only a few top tracks; why gamble on the smaller ones?
---
A bunch of silent projects, and this time new leeks are about to be hooked again.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorker
· 13h ago
Low-priced listings are just traps; I don't touch them.
Really, those magicblock things are all the same, just for profit.
I've seen too many PPT packaging tricks; Trove's approach is quite outrageous.
It's still better to stick with top projects; small-scale risks are really high.
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaser
· 13h ago
Can't afford low-priced plays, really
A bunch of projects have run away, I've seen too many
Stick with big projects, small ones are just traps
These days, PPT packaging skills are incredible, you can't see through them at all
The core ecosystem is the key, stop messing around
View OriginalReply0
HalfPositionRunner
· 13h ago
I've seen through this setup long ago; you really need to be cautious with the PPT project.
Low-priced projects are full of traps; you need to recognize them. Many people have fallen into this trap.
The game incubated by magicblock basically disappeared after the public offering, with no news for months. Not to mention users, even the project team can't be reached. Such situations are too common.
I paid attention to Trove when it appeared in the Echo ecosystem. When I saw the introduction mentioning the CSGO item index, I immediately saw through it—this is just PPT. No matter how beautifully the concept is packaged, the underlying logic is still the same old story. A friend later privately asked me about it, and I directly refused, mainly for this reason.
The current approach is very clear: chasing top-tier projects is the right move. Even if small projects blow up, the losses are limited, but those pseudo-selected, pseudo-innovative projects carry too high a risk. Instead of betting on small projects turning around, it's better to focus on directions within the ecosystem that have already been proven. The power of market filtering is real.