When it comes to privacy coins, most people first think of projects that are just riding the hype. But Dusk is taking a completely different approach.
Its core logic is very clear: it’s not about hype but about truly developing privacy technology that is usable in finance. What’s the difference? Many privacy projects focus on “being invisible,” but Dusk emphasizes “financial-grade privacy”—it remains hidden during normal operations, used to lock transaction data and business secrets, but when regulatory or audit needs arise, data can be disclosed in compliance.
This is like providing a double-edged sword for on-chain financial institutions. On one hand, sensitive transaction information is protected; on the other hand, the compliance window is always open. Institutions don’t have to worry about crossing legal boundaries, and regulators can operate with peace of mind. Such a design is crucial for attracting traditional financial participants.
From another perspective, Dusk is more like an “on-chain entry point for financial institutions,” rather than relying on hype and calls to attract retail investors. It follows a mature, steady, and gradually growing transaction volume approach. This strategy may seem slow, but for a project truly aiming to establish itself in the financial sector, it might be the smartest choice.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaverseVagabond
· 12h ago
This is the real deal. Projects that don't follow the hype and boast are indeed rare.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 12h ago
Hmm, the logic is indeed clear... but will institutions really buy in? Dusk didn't rally during the previous all-time high either.
I just want to know if the MACD has a golden cross. Projects that are slow to heat up are most likely to cut me at the bottom.
It seems that stability actually means a lack of narrative. The crypto circle eats this up; being serious might actually be at a disadvantage.
The compliance window is open and sounds good, but isn't that just a compromise? Privacy coins are meant to be private to the end.
It sounds nice, but isn't it just to avoid being delisted by exchanges... I bet five bucks it won't outperform mainstream coins during the same period.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTalker
· 12h ago
actually, if we break this down through the lens of regulatory game theory... dusk's playing 4d chess while everyone else is doing marketing theater, ngl
Reply0
FallingLeaf
· 12h ago
Hey, Dusk's logic is indeed well-executed. Balancing compliance and privacy isn't something just anyone can do.
When it comes to privacy coins, most people first think of projects that are just riding the hype. But Dusk is taking a completely different approach.
Its core logic is very clear: it’s not about hype but about truly developing privacy technology that is usable in finance. What’s the difference? Many privacy projects focus on “being invisible,” but Dusk emphasizes “financial-grade privacy”—it remains hidden during normal operations, used to lock transaction data and business secrets, but when regulatory or audit needs arise, data can be disclosed in compliance.
This is like providing a double-edged sword for on-chain financial institutions. On one hand, sensitive transaction information is protected; on the other hand, the compliance window is always open. Institutions don’t have to worry about crossing legal boundaries, and regulators can operate with peace of mind. Such a design is crucial for attracting traditional financial participants.
From another perspective, Dusk is more like an “on-chain entry point for financial institutions,” rather than relying on hype and calls to attract retail investors. It follows a mature, steady, and gradually growing transaction volume approach. This strategy may seem slow, but for a project truly aiming to establish itself in the financial sector, it might be the smartest choice.