Imagine if a major social platform removed accounts from a particular region – would it solve the fake news epidemic? Some argue that a significant chunk of coordinated disinformation campaigns originate from specific geographic sources, suggesting that stricter regional moderation could theoretically eliminate up to 99% of platform manipulation. The hypothesis raises interesting questions about content governance, bot networks, and whether geographic-based enforcement is a viable (or ethical) solution to fighting misinformation at scale.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ReverseTradingGuruvip
· 10h ago
99% — that number sounds outrageous; who calculated it?
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothingvip
· 10h ago
99% eradication of false information? Buddy, that's a naive idea. Disconnecting from the internet can't stop humanity's talent for storytelling.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyervip
· 10h ago
That 99% figure sounds outrageous. How does banning accounts by region help? Those teams that are really making money have already established cross-border operations.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)