Munger's take on building real wealth? Forget about owning dozens of stocks. While most investors obsess over spreading their bets everywhere, he stuck to a different playbook—picking a handful of exceptional companies and really knowing your shit about them. That's where the safety was, in his view. Deep conviction beats scattered bets. Owning a few businesses you truly understand beats the endless chase for diversification. The difference isn't subtle: one approach demands real knowledge, the other just requires checking boxes.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
just_here_for_vibesvip
· 2h ago
Munger's theory sounds great, but how many people can really research a few stocks to that depth? Most people still have to play it safe and diversify their risks.
View OriginalReply0
GasWastingMaximalistvip
· 3h ago
Instead of casting a wide net, it's better to focus on one or two that truly understand. That's the principle. Retail investors are still hoarding junk coins.
View OriginalReply0
BlockTalkvip
· 3h ago
That Munger stuff, to put it simply, don't be greedy. Focusing on a few and mastering them is better than anything else.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 3h ago
Retail investors are still playing the game of diversifying risk, but it's actually like missing overflow checks in the code—what seems safe is actually full of hidden dangers.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)