A recent market report has circulated, dedicating considerable space to examining two key figures and building the foundation for bearish arguments around a certain project. One aspect of the analysis—regarding advertising expenditure patterns—carries some plausibility. However, the allegations about embedding gaming or fraudulent mechanisms into technical infrastructure feel less substantiated and appear somewhat speculative at this stage.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RetiredMiner
· 6h ago
Another report like this, to put it simply, is just selective evidence. There are very few arguments that can actually be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 6h ago
This report just feels like making up stories. You can still look at the advertising expenses, but what about any manipulation on the technical level? Uh... where's the evidence, friend?
View OriginalReply0
TideReceder
· 6h ago
Sounds like another report fabricated just to set the tone... They can still talk about advertising expenses, but game mechanism fraud? That's pure nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassin
· 6h ago
Hmm... this report seems to be just for the sake of criticizing. The advertising expenditure part has some data support, but as for game mechanics, scam infrastructure... it's purely empty talk, right?
View OriginalReply0
DefiPlaybook
· 6h ago
The data on advertising expenditure can still be viewed, but the accusations of embedding game mechanics... honestly, it's just armchair theorizing, with no on-chain evidence to support it.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 6h ago
Another report like this, the advertising expenditure part is somewhat credible, but claiming there's some scam buried in the technical aspect? Pure nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
StealthDeployer
· 6h ago
Oh, it's this kind of report again. The advertising investment part is somewhat reasonable, but talking about embedding scam mechanisms... it feels ridiculous.
A recent market report has circulated, dedicating considerable space to examining two key figures and building the foundation for bearish arguments around a certain project. One aspect of the analysis—regarding advertising expenditure patterns—carries some plausibility. However, the allegations about embedding gaming or fraudulent mechanisms into technical infrastructure feel less substantiated and appear somewhat speculative at this stage.