2026-01-20 02:38:53

In the crypto ecosystem, what kind of projects are worth paying attention to? We believe there are several key characteristics: first, they are truly rooted in blockchain-native value rather than borrowing concepts; second, they are built on community consensus rather than centralized decision-making; and finally, they always consider the perspective of participants.

Such projects typically attract like-minded individuals to gather together. When a community is composed of members with the same values, the resulting ecosystem will be healthier and more sustainable. Because everyone is a promoter rather than an observer, the entire system can truly operate.

If you also agree with these principles, then consider exploring projects that genuinely practice community governance and give every member a voice. The future of Web3 should be shaped by us together.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

alpha_leaker

· 6h ago

Sounds good, but how many projects have actually achieved it? Most are just good at talking the talk. To be honest, it still depends on whether the governance tokens truly hold power—don't just shout slogans. Community consensus is just afraid of being exploited by big players to harvest retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

LightningPacketLoss

· 6h ago

Sounds good, but I always feel like every project is saying the same thing Projects with genuine consensus have already emerged, and those still shouting this slogan... hmm By the way, can you name a few projects that truly give community members a voice? Community governance sounds wonderful, but in the end, it still depends on token prices I agree with the idea of rooting in intrinsic value, but decentralized governance... it's a bit mysterious Wait a minute, why do these "community consensus" projects all end up being controlled by big players? They talk a lot of fancy words, but when it comes to critical moments, decision-making still falls to a few people Having just a concept isn't enough; it depends on actual implementation

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 6h ago

It sounds good, but how many projects truly implement decentralized decision-making? Most are still just harvesting profits from investors.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaSunglasses

· 6h ago

That's true, but in reality, very few projects actually achieve it. Is it genuine consensus or just another way to harvest profits? You need to discern for yourself.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOSapien

· 7h ago

Sounds good, but how many truly decentralized projects are there now? Most are still controlled by big players. --- Community consensus sounds great, but in practice, internal conflicts happen all the time. I'll just observe quietly. --- It's the same old rhetoric. The key question is, how is the token distributed? That’s the core issue. --- I completely agree, but finding such projects is even harder than mining for coins... --- Wait, hold on, there's a logical problem here. Ultimately, in decentralization, those with more money still hold more influence. --- Early community governance sounded promising, but once it went mainstream, most have changed significantly. --- This is what Web3 should look like, but unfortunately, most examples you see are cautionary tales.

View OriginalReply0

ForkLibertarian

· 7h ago

That's true, but in reality, most projects are just fooling people. They claim to promote community governance, but in fact, big players still call the shots. I hear this kind of talk every day, but I've never seen anyone truly implement it. Anyway, I won't hold my breath. It sounds great, but once the token price drops, the community collapses. No value system can hold it together. This is what Web3 should look like, but unfortunately, such projects are too rare. Another armchair idealist who believes that on-chain data will speak for itself.

View OriginalReply0