2026-01-20 01:38:03

The Cookie project team once promised that token locking was to provide real utility. The question is—where are those promised practical features? How did they just disappear, while the locking mechanism remains completely intact? This deviation has indeed caused some confusion in the community; there's a significant gap between the project's promises and actual execution.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationAlert

· 7h ago

Is the lock-up feature gone? It's a typical case of wanting only the money, not the people.

View OriginalReply0

Blockwatcher9000

· 7h ago

It's the same old trick again, keeping the lock-up mechanism, but the promised features are gone. A typical case of collecting funds first and then abandoning ship.

View OriginalReply0

DaoGovernanceOfficer

· 7h ago

*sigh* empirically speaking, this is just token-weighted voting theater masquerading as utility. they promised "application value" but delivered zero governance efficiency metrics. the data suggests they only kept the lock-in mechanism because—shock horror—it benefits token holders, not the protocol health.

Reply0

MEVictim