2026-01-20 01:37:56

The DeFi ecosystem doesn't require stricter regulatory frameworks—what it actually needs is robust protection mechanisms. Rather than imposing additional compliance layers that could stifle innovation, the focus should shift toward safeguarding users, protocols, and market integrity through industry-driven standards and transparent security practices.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerLiquidated

· 9h ago

ngl How many times have I heard this set of words... Self-regulation sounds convincing every time, but how do you explain those bloody incidents on the chain?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTinfoilHat

· 9h ago

Regulation, huh? People really overthink it. DeFi should rely on its own security mechanisms and not get bogged down with complicated compliance that stifles innovation.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 9h ago

When it comes to regulation, instead of stifling innovation, it's better to first ensure security is solid. This logic makes sense.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropAutomaton

· 9h ago

To be honest, the regulatory approach is like a chronic poison for DeFi; it's better to establish our own security standards.

View OriginalReply0

mev_me_maybe

· 9h ago

NGL regulation is rigid and boring; the real way out still depends on self-discipline. Industry self-regulation is much better than bureaucratic approaches.

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 10h ago

Industry self-governance is much better than rigid regulation, really. But on the other hand, who sets these safety standards? Isn't it still the big players who call the shots?

View OriginalReply0